action #15136
closedcoordination #9486: [sle][opensuse][functional][epic][y]Network Installations
[functional][hard][yast][y] network installations over SMB
100%
Description
Motivation¶
test install over SMB repositories
Acceptance criteria¶
- AC1: We have at least one installation scenario installing from a repository shared over SMB on both osd as well as o3
Tasks¶
The only missing part is tests on o3 needing a SMB server as we already have on osd. We could be messy and apply what we have on osd or do it the right way and use salt recipes. But so far o3 has salt installed but does not seem to use it itself.
further details¶
/etc/samba/smb.conf from osd¶
[global]
workgroup = openqa.suse.de
passdb backend = tdbsam
printing = cups
printcap name = cups
printcap cache time = 750
cups options = raw
map to guest = Bad User
logon path = \\%L\profiles\.msprofile
logon home = \\%L\%U\.9xprofile
logon drive = P:
usershare allow guests = No
add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -c Machine -d /var/lib/nobody -s /bin/false %m$
domain logons = No
domain master = No
security = user
wins support = No
[inst]
comment = openqa assets
guest ok = Yes
inherit acls = Yes
path = /var/lib/openqa/factory/repo/
read only = Yes
Original proposal: different alternatives¶
- check SMB testsuite in SLEnkins (@mawerner, @theheijk)
- add https/smb/nfs support to openqa.suse.de (run the corresponding servers there)
- test against dist.suse.de already offering smb. As builds are not preserved on dist we would need to restrict this to milestone builds
Checklist
- modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO
- wait for fix poo#17346
- test and merge rsync.pl from https://gitlab.suse.de/thehejik/scripts/commit/e19ae8a59b86df8ea39d4d81d7f5bea8ed61a097
- s390x
- x86_64
Updated by mkravec about 8 years ago
NFS - works fine on openqa.suse.de - https://openqa.suse.de/tests/646729
HTTPS - I am not sure if there is support in sles, there is no HTTPS option in installer (F4 menu) and iirc it did not work when I entered manually
Updated by maritawerner almost 8 years ago
HTTPS is covered in a separate ticket.
Updated by okurz almost 8 years ago
- Assignee changed from maritawerner to thehejik
- would the SMB testsuite in slenkins help us to test installation over SMB?
If I get it right a SMB test suite should setup a server and a client and check that the client can access files from the server. If that is the case with the existing test case can we use that server component to do an installation from it when we put installation media (e.g. SLES + some addons) on the server?
On which architectures would that be possible for both server+client?
Updated by thehejik almost 8 years ago
okurz wrote:
- would the SMB testsuite in slenkins help us to test installation over SMB?
Unfortunately, I don't see any way how to (re)use SMB server SUT from SLEnkins samba testsuite as a source of test-image for any openQA job.
If I get it right a SMB test suite should setup a server and a client and check that the client can access files from the server. If that is the case with the existing test case can we use that server component to do an installation from it when we put installation media (e.g. SLES + some addons) on the server?
I got your point but I found it a bit difficult to implement because:
- SLEnkins suites are running on special ovs/tap workers in openQA, it means that regular job running on x86_64 worker will have no access to ovs/tap network and vice versa
- It will need some locking policy to be set, for example if a new image is available run SMB server test, copy new image on that server and then run job for SMB installation
- interoperability between normal needle based test and SLEnkins SUTs is not supported (not sure if possible)
On which architectures would that be possible for both server+client?
The current SLEnkins wrapper in openQA supports only x86_64 VMs and the same stands for slenkins-cloud. SLEnkins itself supports aarch64, x86_64, ppc64le, ppc64 and s390 architectures but only if you are running the test on bare-metal with help of kvm or on x86_64 in emulation mode (s390 supported only on SLE11 in emu).
Updated by mgriessmeier almost 8 years ago
We've set up a smb server on o.s.d. which can be accessed over the share 'install' and points to the /var/lib/openqa/factory/repo/ like our ftp server does.
first quick try on s390x succeeded
Updated by thehejik almost 8 years ago
mgriessmeier wrote:
We've set up a smb server on o.s.d. which can be accessed over the share 'install' and points to the /var/lib/openqa/factory/repo/ like our ftp server does.
first quick try on s390x succeeded
Yeah, thats much better solution I think.
Updated by mgriessmeier almost 8 years ago
working testcases on o.s.d for s390x:
SLES: https://openqa.suse.de/tests/773865
SLES+HA: https://openqa.suse.de/tests/773864
Updated by maritawerner almost 8 years ago
- Checklist item changed from to [x] s390x, [ ] aarch64, [ ] x86_64, [ ] ppc64le
So we need to add the other arches as well (if possible).
Updated by thehejik almost 8 years ago
- Checklist item changed from [x] s390x, [ ] aarch64, [ ] x86_64, [ ] ppc64le to [ ] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO, [x] s390x, [ ] aarch64, [ ] x86_64, [ ] ppc64le
I have created simple smb install test for x86_64 using standard variables:
NETBOOT=1 (in Media definition on o.s.d)
MIRROR_SMB=smb://openqa.suse.de/inst/SLE-12-SP3-Server-DVD-x86_64-Build0256-Media1 (from rsync.pl - needs to be modified for MIRROR_SMB and for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO)
INSTALL_SOURCE=smb
And it works, see http://dhcp209.suse.cz/tests/3349
Complete test sles12_minimal_base-smb definition:
DESKTOP=textmode
HDDSIZEGB=50
INSTALLONLY=1
INSTALL_SOURCE=smb
MIRROR_SMB=smb://openqa.suse.de/inst/SLE-12-SP3-Server-DVD-x86_64-Build0256-Media1
NETBOOT=1
PATTERNS=base,minimal
TOGGLEHOME=1
Needles https://gitlab.suse.de/openqa/os-autoinst-needles-sles/merge_requests/316
Updated by thehejik almost 8 years ago
- Checklist item changed from to [x] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO
Updated by thehejik almost 8 years ago
- Checklist item changed from to [ ] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO
Updated by thehejik almost 8 years ago
- Checklist item changed from [ ] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO, [x] s390x, [ ] aarch64, [ ] x86_64, [ ] ppc64le to [ ] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO, [x] s390x, [ ] aarch64, [ ] x86_64, [ ] ppc64le, [ ] wait for fix poo#17346, [ ] test and merge rsync.pl from https://gitlab.suse.de/thehejik/scripts/commit/e19ae8a59b86df8ea39d4d81d7f5bea8ed61a097
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
Modification of rsync.pl done at https://gitlab.suse.de/thehejik/scripts/commit/e19ae8a59b86df8ea39d4d81d7f5bea8ed61a097
but I can't test it due https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/17346 - rsync.pl does a sync even if --dry option is used for sle12_sp3
Updated by thehejik almost 8 years ago
- Checklist item changed from [ ] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO, [x] s390x, [ ] aarch64, [ ] x86_64, [ ] ppc64le, [ ] wait for fix poo#17346, [ ] test and merge rsync.pl from https://gitlab.suse.de/thehejik/scripts/commit/e19ae8a59b86df8ea39d4d81d7f5bea8ed61a097 to [x] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO, [ ] wait for fix poo#17346, [ ] test and merge rsync.pl from https://gitlab.suse.de/thehejik/scripts/commit/e19ae8a59b86df8ea39d4d81d7f5bea8ed61a097, [x] s390x, [ ] aarch64, [ ] x86_64, [ ] ppc64le
Updated by thehejik almost 8 years ago
- Checklist item changed from to [x] wait for fix poo#17346
Updated by thehejik almost 8 years ago
- Checklist item changed from to [x] test and merge rsync.pl from https://gitlab.suse.de/thehejik/scripts/commit/e19ae8a59b86df8ea39d4d81d7f5bea8ed61a097
Updated by okurz almost 8 years ago
https://gitlab.suse.de/openqa/scripts/merge_requests/67 merged.
I adapted the existing testsuite "smb+xfs" as it was used for s390x and enabled aarch64, x64_64 and ppc64le scenarios within the test development group. After they are shown to be stable we move them to "sles: functional"
Updated by thehejik almost 8 years ago
- Checklist item changed from [x] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO, [x] wait for fix poo#17346, [x] test and merge rsync.pl from https://gitlab.suse.de/thehejik/scripts/commit/e19ae8a59b86df8ea39d4d81d7f5bea8ed61a097, [x] s390x, [ ] aarch64, [ ] x86_64, [ ] ppc64le to [x] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO, [x] wait for fix poo#17346, [x] test and merge rsync.pl from https://gitlab.suse.de/thehejik/scripts/commit/e19ae8a59b86df8ea39d4d81d7f5bea8ed61a097, [x] s390x, [ ] aarch64, [x] x86_64, [ ] ppc64le
I have added test for x86_64 medium Server-MINI-ISO named "gnome_smb" https://openqa.suse.de/tests/803763#
I'm affraid that Oli's approach with smb+xfs will not work because MIRROR_SMB is available only for Server-MINI-ISO medium and bootloader_setup.pm doesn't know the SMB URI - contrary to bootloader_s390.pm where the SMB URI is hardcoded.
Results for oli's smb+xfs:
- ppc failed https://openqa.suse.de/tests/802730#step/bootloader_ofw/9 - it is still using ISO as install source
- x86 failed https://openqa.suse.de/tests/802914#step/bootloader/15 - empty dialog for smb share
- aarch64 missing
Updated by okurz over 7 years ago
So what are your plans on this? The tests in test development still show the same results (and keep wasting ressources). We could just remove them and assume the coverage on s390x is enough in general. Or just add some test settings? The test code can be cleaned up nevertheless to not do something "architecture" specific which it actually isn't.
Updated by thehejik over 7 years ago
okurz wrote:
So what are your plans on this? The tests in test development still show the same results (and keep wasting ressources). We could just remove them and assume the coverage on s390x is enough in general. Or just add some test settings? The test code can be cleaned up nevertheless to not do something "architecture" specific which it actually isn't.
Please remove your tests from Test Development group, it will not work and as you said it is just wasting resources. Right now we have a coverage for s390x from Mathias and x86_64 from me.
Imo it would be nice to have ppc64le and aarch64 SMB installation tests as well.
Updated by okurz over 7 years ago
Agreed. misleading scenarios for smb+xfs@ppc64le and smb+xfs@x86_64 removed from test development group so that they won't get scheduled and provide a wrong impression.
@thehejik feel free to unassign the ticket from yourself when you don't plan to work on it in the next time.
Updated by okurz almost 7 years ago
- Checklist item changed from [x] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO, [x] wait for fix poo#17346, [x] test and merge rsync.pl from https://gitlab.suse.de/thehejik/scripts/commit/e19ae8a59b86df8ea39d4d81d7f5bea8ed61a097, [x] s390x, [ ] aarch64, [x] x86_64, [ ] ppc64le to [x] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO, [x] wait for fix poo#17346, [x] test and merge rsync.pl from https://gitlab.suse.de/thehejik/scripts/commit/e19ae8a59b86df8ea39d4d81d7f5bea8ed61a097, [x] s390x, [ ] aarch64, [ ] x86_64, [ ] ppc64le
- Status changed from Feedback to Workable
I'm afraid what thehejik mentioned in #15136#note-19 could have never worked because the variable NETBOOT=1 is not set. The installer never switched to use SMB -> #30640
Updated by okurz almost 7 years ago
- Blocked by action #29393: [sle][functional][tools] test fails in bootloader_s390 - check settings of samba server on o.s.d added
Updated by okurz almost 7 years ago
- Checklist item changed from [x] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO, [x] wait for fix poo#17346, [x] test and merge rsync.pl from https://gitlab.suse.de/thehejik/scripts/commit/e19ae8a59b86df8ea39d4d81d7f5bea8ed61a097, [x] s390x, [ ] aarch64, [ ] x86_64, [ ] ppc64le to [x] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO, [x] wait for fix poo#17346, [x] test and merge rsync.pl from https://gitlab.suse.de/thehejik/scripts/commit/e19ae8a59b86df8ea39d4d81d7f5bea8ed61a097, [x] s390x, [ ] aarch64, [x] x86_64, [ ] ppc64le
- Target version set to Milestone 14
blocking tickets resolved, e.g. also #30640
IMHO the missing part is now openSUSE which needs help of the openQA or openSUSE admins to setup a SMB server on o3. The architectures aarch64 and ppc64le do not need an extra SMB test.
Updated by okurz almost 7 years ago
- Subject changed from network installations over SMB to [functional]network installations over SMB
Updated by okurz almost 7 years ago
- Checklist item changed from [x] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO, [x] wait for fix poo#17346, [x] test and merge rsync.pl from https://gitlab.suse.de/thehejik/scripts/commit/e19ae8a59b86df8ea39d4d81d7f5bea8ed61a097, [x] s390x, [ ] aarch64, [x] x86_64, [ ] ppc64le to [x] modify rsync.pl for generating MIRROR_SMB for FLAVOR=Server-MINI-ISO, [x] wait for fix poo#17346, [x] test and merge rsync.pl from https://gitlab.suse.de/thehejik/scripts/commit/e19ae8a59b86df8ea39d4d81d7f5bea8ed61a097, [x] s390x, [x] x86_64
- Subject changed from [functional]network installations over SMB to [functional][hard][yast]network installations over SMB
- Description updated (diff)
- Assignee deleted (
mloviska) - Target version changed from Milestone 14 to Milestone 18
Actually I think we are good enough here with covering x86_64 and s390x architecture-wise. So the missing part is only openSUSE now.
@mloviska I don't see you actually working on this so I unassign you.
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Subject changed from [functional][hard][yast]network installations over SMB to [functional][hard][yast][y] network installations over SMB
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Target version changed from Milestone 18 to Milestone 18
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Target version changed from Milestone 18 to future
Updated by okurz about 6 years ago
- Status changed from Workable to Rejected
- Assignee set to okurz
ok, I give up now ;)
Updated by mgriessmeier almost 6 years ago
- Related to action #47879: [functional][u][s390x] test fails in bootloader_s390: smb test is not booting the installer over info-file added
Updated by mgriessmeier almost 6 years ago
- Related to deleted (action #47879: [functional][u][s390x] test fails in bootloader_s390: smb test is not booting the installer over info-file)