action #34576
open[sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenario
Added by sebchlad about 6 years ago. Updated about 2 months ago.
0%
Description
The basic idea is to test migration more widely by re-using migration openQA modules in different areas so - for instance - some network services could be installed and configured on earlier version of SLES, then migration openQA module could be "called", the migration to a given SLES version could be done, and eventually we could see if pre-configured service is still working.
Suggested by SLE Architect - Thorsten K. - for his preferences.
- setup openldap server with YaST module
- setup ldap client (sssd)
- setup autorization against Windows domain server
The target for this is SLE12 SP4.
Updated by sebchlad about 6 years ago
Next step: I'll talk to Okurz to get his view and see what qa sle func team is already doing in this regards.
Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago
- Target version changed from future to future
Updated by pcervinka over 3 years ago
- Tags set to migration, network
- Project changed from 46 to 178
- Subject changed from [kernel][networking][migration] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenario to Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenario
- Target version changed from future to 643
Updated by pcervinka over 3 years ago
@sebchlad I don't think it is in our scope. What do you think? Reject? There are other teams form migration, also Windows domain server for auth is within other teams.
Updated by sebchlad over 3 years ago
It seems that there was no project management done over this, in the meantime migration team is doing a bit different things, so I would not bother re-discussing it.
It should be QE technical project mgmt driving it.
I would reject it then.
Updated by okurz over 3 years ago
As long as it's not done yet, it's not done yet. Why would you reject it? If you think the migration team can help I suggest to clarify with them. Just hoping that they cover it is not good quality assurance, right? ;)
Updated by pcervinka over 3 years ago
- Project changed from 178 to openQA Project
- Subject changed from Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenario to [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenario
- Target version deleted (
643)
Releasing from kernel qe as the content is out of scope, so any team interested in can pick it up.
Updated by okurz over 3 years ago
- Project changed from openQA Project to openQA Tests
- Category set to New test
- Target version deleted (
future)
Updated by szarate over 3 years ago
- Status changed from New to Rejected
with this ping pong, I foresee that this ticket will rot.
Oliver if you still think it's a valid ticket, please assign it to yourself when reopening it.
Updated by okurz over 3 years ago
- Status changed from Rejected to New
- Parent task set to #73417
why should I assign to myself? The ticket has valid team markers, e.g. "[migration]". Can we keep it for the migration team? Especially as the topic of SSSD and LDAP is raised by customers, support, Product Managers, etc. . Added the corresponding ticket as "parent".
Updated by coolgw almost 3 years ago
Very old ticket and i have following questions on this ticket. Please see my comments/suggestion:
*setup openldap server with YaST module <==== from 15sp3 the openldap server start obsolete, so from migration view this can be SKIP?
*setup ldap client (sssd) <==== for sssd service check(before / after ) migration we have another ticket https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/70168 tracking within migration group. And this task pending on https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479.
*setup autorization against Windows domain server <=====If we need authorization against windows domain server, then we also need consider this kind of scenario within ticket https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479. Or we create another ticket for sssd + windows server scenario for QE CORE team. BTW: we have to use multi machine setup for this scenario(one is for sssd client and another is windows domain server)
Updated by szarate almost 3 years ago
coolgw wrote:
Very old ticket and i have following questions on this ticket. Please see my comments/suggestion:
*setup openldap server with YaST module <==== from 15sp3 the openldap server start obsolete, so from migration view this can be SKIP?
Yes, I don't think this is needed, if it's already tested somewhere else, after all, once the initial config is done, why would the user come back to yast?.
*setup ldap client (sssd) <==== for sssd service check(before / after ) migration we have another ticket https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/70168 tracking within migration group. And this task pending on https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479.
I think that #89479 doesn't block you anymore, so you could proceed with the service check part.
*setup autorization against Windows domain server <=====If we need authorization against windows domain server, then we also need consider this kind of scenario within ticket https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479. Or we create another ticket for sssd + windows server scenario for QE CORE team. BTW: we have to use multi machine setup for this scenario(one is for sssd client and another is windows domain server)
This is being worked on: https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/72169#note-55 and https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/12517 so at a later point when the test is done and stable we can consider adapting the scenario to adapt it for migration. We don't use Multi Machine for this atm, but rather we're using a separate standalone windows machine.
PS: I would reject this ticket, as the points raised by Wayne are already covered. Wayne what do you think?
Updated by szarate almost 3 years ago
Added Wayne (I hope coolgw is Wayne :)) to watchers :), so that he can read the comment above
Updated by coolgw almost 3 years ago
szarate wrote:
coolgw wrote:
Very old ticket and i have following questions on this ticket. Please see my comments/suggestion:
*setup openldap server with YaST module <==== from 15sp3 the openldap server start obsolete, so from migration view this can be SKIP?
Yes, I don't think this is needed, if it's already tested somewhere else, after all, once the initial config is done, why would the user come back to yast?.
*setup ldap client (sssd) <==== for sssd service check(before / after ) migration we have another ticket https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/70168 tracking within migration group. And this task pending on https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479.
I think that #89479 doesn't block you anymore, so you could proceed with the service check part.
[GW]: we blocked on https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/93210 since #89479 not using service check style. Correct me if any misunderstanding.
*setup autorization against Windows domain server <=====If we need authorization against windows domain server, then we also need consider this kind of scenario within ticket https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479. Or we create another ticket for sssd + windows server scenario for QE CORE team. BTW: we have to use multi machine setup for this scenario(one is for sssd client and another is windows domain server)
This is being worked on: https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/72169#note-55 and https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/12517 so at a later point when the test is done and stable we can consider adapting the scenario to adapt it for migration. We don't use Multi Machine for this atm, but rather we're using a separate standalone windows machine.
PS: I would reject this ticket, as the points raised by Wayne are already covered. Wayne what do you think?
Updated by szarate almost 3 years ago
coolgw wrote:
[GW]: we blocked on https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/93210 since #89479 not using service check style. Correct me if any misunderstanding.
You can pick that ticket also, so that you don't have to wait for a longer period of time.
Updated by maritawerner over 2 years ago
@coolgw could you please close that ticket? I think everything is done?
Updated by coolgw over 2 years ago
@szarate
setup autorization against Windows domain server
[GW]:Is there any test case already running on ODS for above scenario?
Updated by szarate over 2 years ago
coolgw wrote:
@szarate
setup autorization against Windows domain server
[GW]:Is there any test case already running on ODS for above scenario?
Updated by coolgw about 2 years ago
- Related to action #70168: [SLE][Migration][backlog]: sssd.pm integrate into service check added
Updated by slo-gin over 1 year ago
This ticket was set to Normal priority but was not updated within the SLO period. Please consider picking up this ticket or just set the ticket to the next lower priority.
Updated by slo-gin about 2 months ago
This ticket was set to Normal priority but was not updated within the SLO period. Please consider picking up this ticket or just set the ticket to the next lower priority.