https://progress.opensuse.org/https://progress.opensuse.org/themes/openSUSE/favicon/favicon.ico?15829177842018-04-09T15:05:42ZopenSUSE Project Management ToolopenQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=1107312018-04-09T15:05:42Zsebchladsebastian.chlad@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>Next step: I'll talk to Okurz to get his view and see what qa sle func team is already doing in this regards.</p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=1107342018-04-09T15:05:49Zsebchladsebastian.chlad@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> set to <i>future</i></li></ul> openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=1115322018-04-10T14:49:53Zsebchladsebastian.chlad@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Description</strong> updated (<a title="View differences" href="/journals/111532/diff?detail_id=111451">diff</a>)</li></ul> openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=1295382018-06-15T19:05:55Zokurzokurz@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>future</i> to <i>future</i></li></ul> openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=3435732020-10-26T18:57:18Zpcervinkapcervinka@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Tags</strong> set to <i>migration, network</i></li><li><strong>Project</strong> changed from <i>46</i> to <i>178</i></li><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>[kernel][networking][migration] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenario</i> to <i>Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenario</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>future</i> to <i>643</i></li></ul> openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=3564322020-12-04T09:35:58Zpcervinkapcervinka@suse.com
<ul></ul><p><a class="user active user-mention" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/users/21718">@sebchlad</a> I don't think it is in our scope. What do you think? Reject? There are other teams form migration, also Windows domain server for auth is within other teams.</p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=3564542020-12-04T09:54:24Zsebchladsebastian.chlad@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>It seems that there was no project management done over this, in the meantime migration team is doing a bit different things, so I would not bother re-discussing it.<br>
It should be QE technical project mgmt driving it.</p>
<p>I would reject it then.</p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=3566482020-12-07T11:15:22Zokurzokurz@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>As long as it's not done yet, it's not done yet. Why would you reject it? If you think the migration team can help I suggest to clarify with them. Just hoping that they cover it is not good quality <em>assurance</em>, right? ;)</p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=3566782020-12-07T11:41:42Zpcervinkapcervinka@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Project</strong> changed from <i>178</i> to <i>openQA Project</i></li><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenario</i> to <i>[sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenario</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> deleted (<del><i>643</i></del>)</li></ul><p>Releasing from kernel qe as the content is out of scope, so any team interested in can pick it up.</p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=3566802020-12-07T11:42:13Zpcervinkapcervinka@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> set to <i>future</i></li></ul> openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=3566842020-12-07T12:35:30Zokurzokurz@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Project</strong> changed from <i>openQA Project</i> to <i>openQA Tests</i></li><li><strong>Category</strong> set to <i>New test</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> deleted (<del><i>future</i></del>)</li></ul> openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=3566862020-12-07T12:39:03Zszarate
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Rejected</i></li></ul><p>with this ping pong, I foresee that this ticket will rot. </p>
<p>Oliver if you still think it's a valid ticket, please assign it to yourself when reopening it. </p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=3570642020-12-09T07:05:10Zokurzokurz@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Rejected</i> to <i>New</i></li><li><strong>Parent task</strong> set to <i>#73417</i></li></ul><p>why should I assign to myself? The ticket has valid team markers, e.g. "[migration]". Can we keep it for the migration team? Especially as the topic of SSSD and LDAP is raised by customers, support, Product Managers, etc. . Added the corresponding ticket as "parent".</p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=4108412021-05-27T06:31:47Zcoolgwwegao@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>Very old ticket and i have following questions on this ticket. Please see my comments/suggestion:</p>
<p>*setup openldap server with YaST module <==== from 15sp3 the openldap server start obsolete, so from migration view this can be SKIP?<br>
*setup ldap client (sssd) <==== for sssd service check(before / after ) migration we have another ticket <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/70168" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/70168</a> tracking within migration group. And this task pending on <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479</a>.<br>
*setup autorization against Windows domain server <=====If we need authorization against windows domain server, then we also need consider this kind of scenario within ticket <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479</a>. Or we create another ticket for sssd + windows server scenario for QE CORE team. BTW: we have to use multi machine setup for this scenario(one is for sssd client and another is windows domain server)</p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=4134722021-06-07T10:08:00Zszarate
<ul></ul><p>coolgw wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Very old ticket and i have following questions on this ticket. Please see my comments/suggestion:</p>
<p>*setup openldap server with YaST module <==== from 15sp3 the openldap server start obsolete, so from migration view this can be SKIP?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, I don't think this is needed, if it's already tested somewhere else, after all, once the initial config is done, why would the user come back to yast?.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>*setup ldap client (sssd) <==== for sssd service check(before / after ) migration we have another ticket <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/70168" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/70168</a> tracking within migration group. And this task pending on <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think that <a class="issue tracker-4 status-3 priority-6 priority-high2 closed" title="action: [qe-core] test fails in sssd - Fix sssd testing with openldap, remove use of python-pam (Resolved)" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479">#89479</a> doesn't block you anymore, so you could proceed with the service check part. </p>
<blockquote>
<p>*setup autorization against Windows domain server <=====If we need authorization against windows domain server, then we also need consider this kind of scenario within ticket <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479</a>. Or we create another ticket for sssd + windows server scenario for QE CORE team. BTW: we have to use multi machine setup for this scenario(one is for sssd client and another is windows domain server)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is being worked on: <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/72169#note-55" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/72169#note-55</a> and <a href="https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/12517" class="external">https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/12517</a> so at a later point when the test is done and stable we can consider adapting the scenario to adapt it for migration. We don't use Multi Machine for this atm, but rather we're using a separate standalone windows machine.</p>
<p>PS: I would reject this ticket, as the points raised by Wayne are already covered. Wayne what do you think? </p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=4139962021-06-08T10:25:45Zszarate
<ul></ul><p>Added Wayne (I hope coolgw is Wayne :)) to watchers :), so that he can read the comment above</p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=4144702021-06-09T08:01:10Zcoolgwwegao@suse.com
<ul></ul><p>szarate wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>coolgw wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Very old ticket and i have following questions on this ticket. Please see my comments/suggestion:</p>
<p>*setup openldap server with YaST module <==== from 15sp3 the openldap server start obsolete, so from migration view this can be SKIP?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, I don't think this is needed, if it's already tested somewhere else, after all, once the initial config is done, why would the user come back to yast?.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>*setup ldap client (sssd) <==== for sssd service check(before / after ) migration we have another ticket <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/70168" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/70168</a> tracking within migration group. And this task pending on <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think that <a class="issue tracker-4 status-3 priority-6 priority-high2 closed" title="action: [qe-core] test fails in sssd - Fix sssd testing with openldap, remove use of python-pam (Resolved)" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479">#89479</a> doesn't block you anymore, so you could proceed with the service check part. </p>
<p>[GW]: we blocked on <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/93210" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/93210</a> since <a class="issue tracker-4 status-3 priority-6 priority-high2 closed" title="action: [qe-core] test fails in sssd - Fix sssd testing with openldap, remove use of python-pam (Resolved)" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479">#89479</a> not using service check style. Correct me if any misunderstanding.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>*setup autorization against Windows domain server <=====If we need authorization against windows domain server, then we also need consider this kind of scenario within ticket <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479</a>. Or we create another ticket for sssd + windows server scenario for QE CORE team. BTW: we have to use multi machine setup for this scenario(one is for sssd client and another is windows domain server)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is being worked on: <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/72169#note-55" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/72169#note-55</a> and <a href="https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/12517" class="external">https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/12517</a> so at a later point when the test is done and stable we can consider adapting the scenario to adapt it for migration. We don't use Multi Machine for this atm, but rather we're using a separate standalone windows machine.</p>
<p>PS: I would reject this ticket, as the points raised by Wayne are already covered. Wayne what do you think?</p>
</blockquote>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=4145062021-06-09T08:22:19Zszarate
<ul></ul><p>coolgw wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[GW]: we blocked on <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/93210" class="external">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/93210</a> since <a class="issue tracker-4 status-3 priority-6 priority-high2 closed" title="action: [qe-core] test fails in sssd - Fix sssd testing with openldap, remove use of python-pam (Resolved)" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/89479">#89479</a> not using service check style. Correct me if any misunderstanding.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You can pick that ticket also, so that you don't have to wait for a longer period of time.</p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=4732562021-12-14T14:16:21Zszarate
<ul><li><strong>Parent task</strong> deleted (<del><i>#73417</i></del>)</li></ul> openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=4805772022-01-17T11:17:15Zmaritawernermawerner@suse.com
<ul></ul><p><a class="user active user-mention" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/users/31682">@coolgw</a> could you please close that ticket? I think everything is done?</p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=4811142022-01-19T04:39:43Zcoolgwwegao@suse.com
<ul></ul><p><a class="user active user-mention" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/users/23010">@szarate</a><br>
setup autorization against Windows domain server<br>
[GW]:Is there any test case already running on ODS for above scenario?</p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=4826232022-01-21T09:38:36Zszarate
<ul></ul><p>coolgw wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="user active user-mention" href="https://progress.opensuse.org/users/23010">@szarate</a><br>
setup autorization against Windows domain server<br>
[GW]:Is there any test case already running on ODS for above scenario?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You can check <a href="https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/blob/d8e55380ed7aa90d3d9e3d6284349dd1a961e78e/tests/network/samba/samba_adcli.pm#L74" class="external">https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/blob/d8e55380ed7aa90d3d9e3d6284349dd1a961e78e/tests/network/samba/samba_adcli.pm#L74</a></p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=4898332022-02-11T02:19:59Zcoolgwwegao@suse.com
<ul><li><strong>Related to</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-4 status-15 priority-4 priority-default child" href="/issues/70168">action #70168</a>: [SLE][Migration][backlog]: sssd.pm integrate into service check</i> added</li></ul> openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=5958162023-01-21T00:34:41Zslo-gin
<ul></ul><p>This ticket was set to <strong>Normal</strong> priority but was not updated <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/projects/openqatests/wiki#SLOs-service-level-objectives" class="external">within the SLO period</a>. Please consider picking up this ticket or just set the ticket to the next lower priority.</p>
openQA Tests - action #34576: [sssd][ldap][migration][network] Implement functional testing for network service which would utilize migration scenariohttps://progress.opensuse.org/issues/34576?journal_id=7774392024-03-19T18:22:40Zslo-gin
<ul></ul><p>This ticket was set to <strong>Normal</strong> priority but was not updated <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/projects/openqatests/wiki#SLOs-service-level-objectives" class="external">within the SLO period</a>. Please consider picking up this ticket or just set the ticket to the next lower priority.</p>