action #47849
closed[functional][u] test if system_workarounds is still required as bsc#1105302 is fixed
0%
Description
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105302 is fixed and we might not need workaround anymore.
But as we apply it unconditionally, we cannot see if it appears anywhere.
Suggestion¶
Trigger 100 runs for some not INSTALLONLY scenario on ARM without workaround and check if any soft-lockups appear.
Updated by mgriessmeier about 5 years ago
- Priority changed from Normal to High
- Target version changed from Milestone 24 to Milestone 25
please check that - should be easily doable
Updated by dheidler about 5 years ago
- Status changed from Workable to In Progress
- Assignee set to dheidler
Updated by dheidler about 5 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
Updated by dheidler almost 5 years ago
- Status changed from Workable to In Progress
I found one in https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/973642#step/system_workarounds/7
So I will create a PR to revert my previous PR as the workaround still seems to be required.
Updated by dheidler almost 5 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
Updated by mgriessmeier almost 5 years ago
- Target version changed from Milestone 25 to Milestone 26
Updated by dheidler almost 5 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
The revert PR was merged.
The workaround is still needed.
Updated by okurz almost 5 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
Does it make sense to keep a workaround for a fixed bug and not have a follow-up ticket?
Updated by SLindoMansilla almost 5 years ago
- Priority changed from High to Urgent
Even if the bug was fixed, there are other programs raising soft lockup: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/982218#step/system_workarounds/7
So, the workaround cannot be removed? Or should we remove it to catch other bugs?
Updated by mgriessmeier almost 5 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Workable
- Target version changed from Milestone 26 to Milestone 27
urgent ticket in feedback, no one took a look at for over a month :(
-> for grooming meeting today
Updated by SLindoMansilla almost 5 years ago
- Blocked by action #50345: [functional][u] Usage of kernel parameter kernel.softlockup_panic added
Updated by SLindoMansilla almost 5 years ago
- Blocked by deleted (action #50345: [functional][u] Usage of kernel parameter kernel.softlockup_panic)
Updated by SLindoMansilla almost 5 years ago
- Related to action #50345: [functional][u] Usage of kernel parameter kernel.softlockup_panic added
Updated by SLindoMansilla almost 5 years ago
- Status changed from Workable to Resolved
- Assignee set to mgriessmeier