Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #121555

closed

Multimachine test network setup fails fails in yast2_nfs_client and others

Added by pcervinka about 2 years ago. Updated over 1 year ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
-
Target version:
-
Start date:
2022-12-06
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Observation

openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP5-Online-ppc64le-yast2_nfs_v3_client@ppc64le fails in
yast2_nfs_client

Test suite description

Multi-machine NFSv3 test with Yast. Maintainer: jrivrain@suse.com

Reproducible

Fails since (at least) Build 58.1 (current job)

Expected result

Last good: 52.4 (or more recent)

Further details

Always latest result in this scenario: latest

Test died: Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at sle/lib/mm_network.pm line 122.
    mm_network::configure_static_dns(HASH(0x10008c28b18), "is_nm", "") called at sle/lib/mm_network.pm line 223
    mm_network::setup_static_mm_network("10.0.2.102/24") called at sle/tests/console/yast2_nfs_client.pm line 37
    yast2_nfs_client::run(yast2_nfs_client=HASH(0x1000bc11918)) called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/basetest.pm line 339
    eval {...} called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/basetest.pm line 333
    basetest::runtest(yast2_nfs_client=HASH(0x1000bc11918)) called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/autotest.pm line 387
    eval {...} called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/autotest.pm line 387
    autotest::runalltests() called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/autotest.pm line 244
    eval {...} called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/autotest.pm line 244
    autotest::run_all() called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/autotest.pm line 295
    autotest::__ANON__(Mojo::IOLoop::ReadWriteProcess=HASH(0x1000c45be68)) called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/Mojo/IOLoop/ReadWriteProcess.pm line 326
    eval {...} called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/Mojo/IOLoop/ReadWriteProcess.pm line 326
    Mojo::IOLoop::ReadWriteProcess::_fork(Mojo::IOLoop::ReadWriteProcess=HASH(0x1000c45be68), CODE(0x1000c8d2ee0)) called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/Mojo/IOLoop/ReadWriteProcess.pm line 488
    Mojo::IOLoop::ReadWriteProcess::start(Mojo::IOLoop::ReadWriteProcess=HASH(0x1000c45be68)) called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/autotest.pm line 297
    autotest::start_process() called at /usr/bin/isotovideo line 243

Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Related to qe-yam - action #124014: Watch for powerpc KVM yast2_nfs_v3/4_server/client if network issues still persistRejected2023-02-07

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by pdostal about 2 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Assignee set to pdostal
Actions #2

Updated by maritawerner about 2 years ago

  • Project changed from openQA Tests (public) to qe-yam
  • Category deleted (Bugs in existing tests)
Actions #4

Updated by pdostal about 2 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Feedback

Waiting some time for some test runs.

Actions #5

Updated by syrianidou_sofia about 2 years ago

Seems like we still experience sporadic failures https://openqa.suse.de/tests/10195090#next_previous

Actions #6

Updated by pdostal about 2 years ago

Hello Sofia, the run you mentioned is three days old but my pull request has been merged two days ago. We need to wait for another run.

Actions #7

Updated by slo-gin almost 2 years ago

This ticket was set to High priority but was not updated within the SLO period. Please consider picking up this ticket or just set the ticket to the next lower priority.

Actions #8

Updated by JERiveraMoya almost 2 years ago

It keeps failing sporadically after the fix is merged: https://openqa.suse.de/tests/10441871#next_previous
As the failure happens only with ppc64le KVM (unsupported virtualization) we will move it to development group where we don't plan to fix it in the near future.

Actions #9

Updated by JERiveraMoya almost 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
  • Assignee changed from pdostal to syrianidou_sofia
  • Priority changed from High to Low
  • Target version set to Current

MR: https://gitlab.suse.de/qsf-y/qa-sle-functional-y/-/merge_requests/465
Please file another ticket for your squad if your squad is interested on working in Power KVM issues/networking problems.

Actions #10

Updated by syrianidou_sofia almost 2 years ago

  • Related to action #124014: Watch for powerpc KVM yast2_nfs_v3/4_server/client if network issues still persist added
Actions #11

Updated by pdostal almost 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to In Progress
  • Assignee changed from syrianidou_sofia to pdostal
Actions #12

Updated by JERiveraMoya almost 2 years ago

  • Project changed from qe-yam to openQA Tests (public)
  • Target version deleted (Current)

@pdostal, please assign to your squad this ticket, Yam squad does not plan to work in the near future in ppc64le Power KVM due to it is unsupported virtualization.
Set label for your squad or whatever subproject you use.

Actions #13

Updated by JERiveraMoya almost 2 years ago

  • Project changed from openQA Tests (public) to qe-yam
Actions #14

Updated by JERiveraMoya almost 2 years ago

JERiveraMoya wrote:

@pdostal, please assign to your squad this ticket, Yam squad does not plan to work in the near future in ppc64le Power KVM due to it is unsupported virtualization.
Set label for your squad or whatever subproject you use.

discussed with Pavel that we keep it in Yam subproject but without Target version, so it doesn't show in our Sprint backlog and he still can help and request our assistance any time. thanks!

Actions #15

Updated by lpalovsky almost 2 years ago

Hello. Seems like there is the same issue on HA/SLES4SAP tests while supportserver is being configured:
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/10465532#step/setup/15
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/10471189#step/setup/15

In those cases the "get_host_resolv_conf" function is called as well.
https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/blob/8b5ee4b9dad9a4ea0661c7523a62c4e5566df223/lib/mm_network.pm#L28

From what I see the issue might be specific to "malbec" worker. So far the test passes on others.

Actions #16

Updated by openqa_review almost 2 years ago

This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:

This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: SAPHanaSR_ScaleUp_PerfOpt_supportserver
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/10563425#step/setup/1

To prevent further reminder comments one of the following options should be followed:

  1. The test scenario is fixed by applying the bug fix to the tested product or the test is adjusted
  2. The openQA job group is moved to "Released" or "EOL" (End-of-Life)
  3. The bugref in the openQA scenario is removed or replaced, e.g. label:wontfix:boo1234

Expect the next reminder at the earliest in 28 days if nothing changes in this ticket.

Actions #17

Updated by openqa_review almost 2 years ago

This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:

This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: ha_beta_supportserver
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/10599261#step/setup/1

To prevent further reminder comments one of the following options should be followed:

  1. The test scenario is fixed by applying the bug fix to the tested product or the test is adjusted
  2. The openQA job group is moved to "Released" or "EOL" (End-of-Life)
  3. The bugref in the openQA scenario is removed or replaced, e.g. label:wontfix:boo1234

Expect the next reminder at the earliest in 56 days if nothing changes in this ticket.

Actions #18

Updated by pdostal over 1 year ago

  • Assignee deleted (pdostal)

I agree with Lumir. This is probably worker-specific issue.

Actions #19

Updated by JERiveraMoya over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Rejected
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF