Observation¶

https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/4128 mentions t/05-scheduler-full.t 100.00% <0.00%> (+1.59%) in a clearly unrelated change. I suspect one of

• https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/4072
• https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/4095
• https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/4096

could have caused this.

Acceptance criteria¶

• AC1: Stable 100% coverage for t/05-scheduler-full.t

Suggestion¶

• Look into the coverage report
• Ensure to have explicit code coverage for potentially flaky parts
• Mark offending code as not coverable e.g. # uncoverable statement