Observation¶

It seems we were just there to have stable coverage but now we have seen flaky coverage in other places again, e.g. in https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/4103 mentions lib/OpenQA/Scheduler.pm 98.14% <0.00%> (-1.86%). I suspect one of

• https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/4072
• https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/4095
• https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/4096

Acceptance criteria¶

• AC1: Stable 100% coverage for lib/OpenQA/Scheduler.pm

Suggestion¶

• Mark offending code as not coverable e.g. # uncoverable statement
• Trigger manual coverage collection in the sub
• Look into https://app.codecov.io/gh/os-autoinst/openQA/compare/4103/changes

# check for stale jobs every 2 minutes      
    Mojo::IOLoop->recurring(        
        120 => sub {        
            OpenQA::Scheduler::Model::Jobs->singleton->incomplete_and_duplicate_stale_jobs;     
        });