Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

action #95117

closed

[qe-core] figure out how to reduce the dependencies on other team's scenarios/test modules.

Added by szarate over 3 years ago. Updated about 2 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
szarate
Category:
Enhancement to existing tests
Target version:
-
Start date:
2021-07-06
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Difficulty:

Description

partitioning_raid module should not be in use. (ping george)

Related issues 1 (0 open — 1 closed)

Related to openQA Tests (public) - action #90329: [qe-core] 15SP2 QU - test fails in raid_gpt on ppc64leResolvedgeor

Actions
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by szarate over 3 years ago

  • Related to action #90329: [qe-core] 15SP2 QU - test fails in raid_gpt on ppc64le added
Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by geor over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Workable
  • Assignee set to geor
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by geor over 3 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

Turns out partitioning_raid is (only) used in some other QR jobs (both for 15-SP2 and 15-SP3) just not failing (yet). There will be actual progress on this side with an upcoming QU.

For now I will do some research on avoiding our schedules having modules that at some point get deprecated by other squads. My direction will be however to do this by increasing our dependency to other squads' scenarios instead of decreasing it, at least for the QU. I will follow up later with more info.

Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by szarate over 3 years ago

geor wrote:

Turns out partitioning_raid is (only) used in some other QR jobs (both for 15-SP2 and 15-SP3) just not failing (yet). There will be actual progress on this side with an upcoming QU.

For now I will do some research on avoiding our schedules having modules that at some point get deprecated by other squads. My direction will be however to do this by increasing our dependency to other squads' scenarios instead of decreasing it, at least for the QU. I will follow up later with more info.

That's a good approach, the main part here is to avoid running deprecated code.

Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by okurz over 3 years ago

  • Category set to Enhancement to existing tests
Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by geor over 3 years ago

  • Assignee deleted (geor)
Actions
Copy link
 #7

Updated by apappas about 3 years ago

  • Assignee set to szarate

Santiago please link the ticket from the yast team.

Actions
Copy link
 #8

Updated by slo-gin about 2 years ago

This ticket was set to Normal priority but was not updated within the SLO period. Please consider picking up this ticket or just set the ticket to the next lower priority.

Actions
Copy link
 #9

Updated by szarate about 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Workable to Rejected

In the meantime we fixed this by moving away from having installation scenarios using legacy installer

Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF