action #59043
closedFix unstable/flaky full-stack test, i.e. remove sleep, and ui tests
Description
Motivation¶
https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2455 introduced a sleep 8
to stabilize a test. Having sleeps in code is better than unstable tests but even better would be to have reliable code that explicitly synchronizes on necessary conditions rather than blind sleeps. Also we have more flaky/unstable tests which we maintain in .circleci/unstable_tests.txt
.
Acceptance criteria¶
- AC1: DONE:
~~* AC2:sleep 8
of https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2455 is removed.circleci/unstable_tests.txt
is empty again ~~ ## Suggestions - Remove explicit and implicit sleep time, e.g. as in https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2626 for the 2s selenium test method time
- Run tests from
.circleci/unstable_tests.txt
locally, reproduce problems and fix them - Ensure tests also run stable within CI, not only locally
Updated by okurz about 5 years ago
- Related to action #59100: Race condition in os-autoinst/commands.pm added
Updated by tinita about 5 years ago
I'll add what I found out so far.
The failure can be reproduced locally by adding a sleep in isotovideo:
sleep 8;
($testprocess, $testfd) = autotest::start_process();
Debugging shows that the set_pause_at_test
command is going through send_json
before isotovideo starts to read:
# enter the main loop: process messages from autotest, command server and backend
while ($loop) {
If I add back the HTTP status call in openQA/lib/OpenQA/Worker/Job.pm
_upload_results
, then it is sent after isotovideo starts reading.
Updated by coolo about 5 years ago
- Priority changed from Normal to Low
I see other issues as more urgent
Updated by okurz almost 5 years ago
- Related to action #62015: jobs incomplete without logs as some workers are rejected (was: Scheduler does not work) added
Updated by okurz almost 5 years ago
- Subject changed from Fix full-stack test flakyness, i.e. remove sleep to Fix unstable/flaky full-stack test, i.e. remove sleep
Updated by okurz almost 5 years ago
- Related to action #54032: flaky test: t/full-stack.t "not ok 44 - Cache tests", subtest: "not ok 17 - test 6 is passed" at /opt/testing_area/openqa/t/lib/OpenQA/Test/FullstackUtils.pm line 120. added
Updated by okurz almost 5 years ago
- Status changed from New to Feedback
- Assignee set to okurz
Checking stability in https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2496
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Workable
First https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2765 , then https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2626#issuecomment-580173772 : it seems the retry and stability tests flag are not properly exported into the sub-scope of the retry script.
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2811 is the fix for the retry script not handling "stability tests" properly. Now I can look into the test failures of https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2626 again.
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
It's hard to keep track on this. However, latest result from rebased code from yesterday show that all tests are very stable except for ui tests, e.g. https://circleci.com/api/v1.1/project/github/os-autoinst/openQA/20110/output/108/0?file=true&allocation-id=5e8b4e234cffa121cb18c895-0-build%2FAC7C4BF showing
[17:16:00] t/ui/01-list.t ............................. 19/? Bailout called. Further testing stopped: findElement: no such element: Unable to locate element: {"method":"css selector","selector":"#scheduled #job_99928"} at /home/squamata/project/t/ui/../lib/OpenQA/SeleniumTest.pm:108
FAILED--Further testing stopped: findElement: no such element: Unable to locate element: {"method":"css selector","selector":"#scheduled #job_99928"} at /home/squamata/project/t/ui/../lib/OpenQA/SeleniumTest.pm:108
Retrying...
[17:16:25] t/ui/01-list.t .............................
[17:16:25] t/ui/01-list.t ............................. 1/?
[17:16:25] t/ui/01-list.t ............................. 12/?
[17:16:25] t/ui/01-list.t ............................. 19/? Bailout called. Further testing stopped: findElement: no such element: Unable to locate element: {"method":"css selector","selector":"#scheduled #job_99928"} at /home/squamata/project/t/ui/../lib/OpenQA/SeleniumTest.pm:108
FAILED--Further testing stopped: findElement: no such element: Unable to locate element: {"method":"css selector","selector":"#scheduled #job_99928"} at /home/squamata/project/t/ui/../lib/OpenQA/SeleniumTest.pm:108
Retrying...
[17:16:43] t/ui/01-list.t .............................
[17:16:43] t/ui/01-list.t ............................. 1/?
[17:16:43] t/ui/01-list.t ............................. 4/?
[17:16:43] t/ui/01-list.t ............................. 14/?
[17:16:43] t/ui/01-list.t ............................. 20/? Bailout called. Further testing stopped: findElement: no such element: Unable to locate element: {"method":"css selector","selector":"#scheduled #job_99928"} at /home/squamata/project/t/ui/../lib/OpenQA/SeleniumTest.pm:108
FAILED--Further testing stopped: findElement: no such element: Unable to locate element: {"method":"css selector","selector":"#scheduled #job_99928"} at /home/squamata/project/t/ui/../lib/OpenQA/SeleniumTest.pm:108
Retrying...
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
- Status changed from Workable to In Progress
Latest PR https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2945 , already merged. Continuing in https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2626 with the goal to also remove all implicit selenium waits which helps us to identify the points where we need to (explicitly) wait and also reduce overall test time in case we do not actually need to wait.
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
- Subject changed from Fix unstable/flaky full-stack test, i.e. remove sleep to Fix unstable/flaky full-stack test, i.e. remove sleep, and ui tests
https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2949 for t/ui/10-tests_overview.t, next: https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2952
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
After some problems in t/ui/13-admin.t I reverted one part with https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2958 . Problem with that specific test module is also that locally I can never run it successfully but get different problems:
t/ui/13-admin.t .. 11/?
# Failed test 'group properties save button is disabled if name is left empty'
# at t/ui/13-admin.t line 437.
# got: undef
# expected: 'true'
# Failed test 'editor name input marked as invalid'
# at t/ui/13-admin.t line 439.
# got: 'form-control'
# expected: 'form-control is-invalid'
# Failed test 'group properties save button is disabled if name is blank'
# at t/ui/13-admin.t line 451.
# got: undef
# expected: 'true'
# Failed test 'editor name input marked as invalid'
# at t/ui/13-admin.t line 453.
# got: 'form-control'
# expected: 'form-control is-invalid'
# Looks like you failed 4 tests of 5.
# Failed test 'update group name with empty or blank'
# at t/ui/13-admin.t line 461.
# Failed test 'keep important results in days edited'
# at t/ui/13-admin.t line 483.
# got: '5000'
# expected: '500'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 10.
# Failed test 'edit some properties'
# at t/ui/13-admin.t line 495.
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 4.
Updated by mkittler over 4 years ago
It works for me locally (not only with my helpers, also with make test TESTS=t/ui/13-admin.t
). The test might be disturbed by leftover files in your repository. You could easily check that by running the test on a clean checkout.
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
shows:
[10:58:38] t/ui/01-list.t ............................. 53/?
# Failed test 'only softfailed and failed jobs displayed'
# at t/ui/01-list.t line 342.
# Structures begin differing at:
# $got->[5] = Does not exist
# $expected->[5] = 'job_99944'
[10:58:38] t/ui/01-list.t ............................. 59/?
# Failed test '99945 again hidden'
# at t/ui/01-list.t line 355.
# Structures begin differing at:
# $got->[8] = 'job_99945'
# $expected->[8] = 'job_80000'
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2987 created for t/ui/01-list.t
Regarding the full stack test, I found out that there is a section of test code that is never executed in circleCI. That explains why tests always fail locally :(
https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2997 for a fix of the failing test part.
What we should still try is to run all the tests on circleCI as well of course, see https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2998 for that.
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2987 merged to mark t/ui/01-list.t as unstable. To be "done" here we need to stabilize the test again so that we can remove it from "unstable" as well again. https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2997 was merged to fix the local runs of the full stack test and https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2998 was merged to ensure all code within t/full-stack.t is also executed within CI and all environments, regardless of any settings. This should avoid further bad surprises. https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/3027 created to cover some minor enhancements together with the actual original goal of removing the "sleep 8" from t/full-stack.t again . Additionally now trying again how current stability looks like in https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2496
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
Lately "scheduler" tests are getting more unstable. I locally ran for i in {001..100}; do echo "## Run $i / 100" && env SCHEDULER_FULLSTACK=1 FULLSTACK=1 KEEP_DB=1 STABILITY_TEST=1 timeout 60 prove -l t/05-scheduler-full.t; done
and found
## Run 022 / 100
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. Can't create listen socket: Address already in use at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 124.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 1/?
# Failed test 'jobs dispatched to different workers'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 100.
# got: undef
# expected: anything else
# Failed test 'each of the two jobs allocated to one of the workers'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 101.
# got: undef
# expected: anything else
# [
# {},
# {}
# ]
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 4.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 2/?
# Failed test 'Scheduler worker job allocation'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 109.
# Failed test 'one job allocated'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 137.
# got: '0'
# expected: '1'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 3.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 3/?
# Failed test 're-scheduling and incompletion of jobs when worker rejects jobs or goes offline'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 189.
Can't use an undefined value as a HASH reference at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 138.
# Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not seen.
…
## Run 055 / 100
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 2/?
# Failed test 'scheduler does not consider broken worker for allocating job'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 128.
# got: '1'
# expected: '0'
# Failed test 'one job allocated'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 163.
# got: '0'
# expected: '1'
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 7.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 3/?
# Failed test 're-scheduling and incompletion of jobs when worker rejects jobs or goes offline'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 189.
Can't use an undefined value as a HASH reference at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 164.
# Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not seen.
…
## Run 066 / 100
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. Can't create listen socket: Address already in use at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 124.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 1/?
# Failed test 'jobs dispatched to different workers'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 100.
# got: undef
# expected: anything else
# Failed test 'each of the two jobs allocated to one of the workers'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 101.
# got: undef
# expected: anything else
# [
# {},
# {}
# ]
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 4.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 2/?
# Failed test 'Scheduler worker job allocation'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 109.
# Failed test 'one job allocated'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 137.
# got: '0'
# expected: '1'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 3.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 3/?
# Failed test 're-scheduling and incompletion of jobs when worker rejects jobs or goes offline'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 189.
Can't use an undefined value as a HASH reference at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 138.
# Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not seen.
…
## Run 088 / 100
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 5/? ## Run 089 / 100
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. Can't create listen socket: Address already in use at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 124.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 1/?
# Failed test 'jobs dispatched to different workers'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 100.
# got: undef
# expected: anything else
# Failed test 'each of the two jobs allocated to one of the workers'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 101.
# got: undef
# expected: anything else
# [
# {},
# {}
# ]
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 4.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 2/?
# Failed test 'Scheduler worker job allocation'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 109.
# Failed test 'one job allocated'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 137.
# got: '0'
# expected: '1'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 3.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 3/?
# Failed test 're-scheduling and incompletion of jobs when worker rejects jobs or goes offline'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 189.
Can't use an undefined value as a HASH reference at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 138.
# Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not seen.
…
## Run 094 / 100
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. Can't create listen socket: Address already in use at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 124.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 1/?
# Failed test 'jobs dispatched to different workers'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 100.
# got: undef
# expected: anything else
# Failed test 'each of the two jobs allocated to one of the workers'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 101.
# got: undef
# expected: anything else
# [
# {},
# {}
# ]
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 4.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 2/?
# Failed test 'Scheduler worker job allocation'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 109.
# Failed test 'one job allocated'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 137.
# got: '0'
# expected: '1'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 3.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 3/?
# Failed test 're-scheduling and incompletion of jobs when worker rejects jobs or goes offline'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 189.
Can't use an undefined value as a HASH reference at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 138.
# Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not seen.
…
## Run 098 / 100
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 2/?
# Failed test 'scheduler does not consider broken worker for allocating job'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 128.
# got: '1'
# expected: '0'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 12.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 3/?
# Failed test 're-scheduling and incompletion of jobs when worker rejects jobs or goes offline'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 189.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 5/? # Looks like you failed 1 test of 5.
so 4/100 times "Can't create listen socket: Address already in use at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/Mojo/IOLoop.pm line 124." and 2/100 times "Failed test 'scheduler does not consider broken worker for allocating job' at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 128."
EDIT: 2020-05-05: Discussed with mkittler and kraih. Mojo::IOLoop::Server::generate_port is a nice thing as it looks for a port that can actually be bound to but it does not reserve the port so there might be a race condition when by chance another service binds to the port between the call to generate_port and actually listening on it in a service. It might be possible to still use an IO::Socket::IP object and pass that object to any using service to keep it reserved. Upstream mojo uses this idiom now https://github.com/mojolicious/mojo/blob/master/t/mojo/daemon.t#L261-L263 ,
it lets the server bind to a random port and then the server provides an api for retrieving the port, never releasing the port, means you have to bind before fork though. I think we should be able to adapt our code to not rely implicitly on a sequential port range anyway.
This is also related to #49883 as well.
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
from https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/os-autoinst/openQA/2688/workflows/40eafa8f-32f5-47cc-8cbc-ea2028be05cd/jobs/25303 on master:
[05:14:14] t/ui/26-jobs_restart.t ..................... 7/? Bailout called. Further testing stopped: clickElement: element click intercepted: Element <a class="cancel" href="/api/v1/jobs/99986/cancel">...</a> is not clickable at point (359, 591). Other element would receive the click: <td class=" test">...</td> at /home/squamata/project/t/ui/../lib/OpenQA/SeleniumTest.pm:109
FAILED--Further testing stopped: clickElement: element click intercepted: Element <a class="cancel" href="/api/v1/jobs/99986/cancel">...</a> is not clickable at point (359, 591). Other element would receive the click: <td class=" test">...</td> at /home/squamata/project/t/ui/../lib/OpenQA/SeleniumTest.pm:109
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
Trying to bring in the changes to make the "test pausing" more stable as well as remove the sleep 8. It seems as in my local environment, with kvm available, tests are more likely to "miss" the moment to stop the test so removing sleep 8 helps but on circle removing the sleep 8 causes other problems.
I managed to prepare a change to set "PAUSE_AT" at the first job to be scheduled. With proper job settings the other jobs work fine after the first one in the full stack test that we want to "pause" but the first job is waiting for 4 minutes before it is continued:
[2020-05-06T20:54:11.0098 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] Running job 1 from http://localhost:42237: 00000001-tinycore-1-flavor-i386-Build1-core@coolone.
[2020-05-06T20:54:11.0100 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] REST-API call: POST http://localhost:42237/api/v1/jobs/1/status
[2020-05-06T20:54:15.0476 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] Starting livelog
[2020-05-06T20:54:15.0477 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] REST-API call: POST http://localhost:42237/api/v1/jobs/1/status
[2020-05-06T20:54:15.0633 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] Stopping livelog
[2020-05-06T20:54:16.0544 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] REST-API call: POST http://localhost:42237/api/v1/jobs/1/status
[2020-05-06T20:54:26.0590 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] Unable to read result-shutdown.json: No such file or directory
[2020-05-06T20:54:26.0592 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] REST-API call: POST http://localhost:42237/api/v1/jobs/1/status
[2020-05-06T20:54:26.0689 CEST] [debug] [pid:20695] Optimizing /tmp/Pp1AxYOqSM/t/full-stack.d/openqa/pool/1/testresults/boot-2.png
[2020-05-06T20:54:26.0765 CEST] [debug] [pid:20695] Uploading artefact boot-2.png as 68d7ac83452b72555f8a6b386629f91f
[2020-05-06T20:54:26.0786 CEST] [debug] [pid:20695] Optimizing /tmp/Pp1AxYOqSM/t/full-stack.d/openqa/pool/1/testresults/.thumbs/boot-2.png
[2020-05-06T20:54:26.0791 CEST] [debug] [pid:20695] Uploading artefact boot-2.png as 68d7ac83452b72555f8a6b386629f91f
[2020-05-06T20:54:26.0811 CEST] [debug] [pid:20695] Optimizing /tmp/Pp1AxYOqSM/t/full-stack.d/openqa/pool/1/testresults/boot-1.png
[2020-05-06T20:54:26.0902 CEST] [debug] [pid:20695] Uploading artefact boot-1.png as ffcb79660bfb954ce251600845c86885
[2020-05-06T20:54:26.0919 CEST] [debug] [pid:20695] Optimizing /tmp/Pp1AxYOqSM/t/full-stack.d/openqa/pool/1/testresults/.thumbs/boot-1.png
[2020-05-06T20:54:26.0924 CEST] [debug] [pid:20695] Uploading artefact boot-1.png as ffcb79660bfb954ce251600845c86885
[2020-05-06T20:54:36.0949 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] Unable to read result-shutdown.json: No such file or directory
…
[2020-05-06T20:59:18.0096 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] REST-API call: POST http://localhost:42237/api/v1/jobs/1/status
[2020-05-06T20:59:28.0137 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] Unable to read result-shutdown.json: No such file or directory
[2020-05-06T20:59:28.0139 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] REST-API call: POST http://localhost:42237/api/v1/jobs/1/status
[2020-05-06T20:59:30.0860 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] Starting livelog
[2020-05-06T20:59:30.0861 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] REST-API call: POST http://localhost:42237/api/v1/jobs/1/status
[2020-05-06T20:59:31.0910 CEST] [debug] [pid:20641] REST-API call: POST http://localhost:42237/api/v1/jobs/1/status
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/3039 merged to remove the "sleep 8", but https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/os-autoinst/openQA/2766/workflows/83d9f777-5f5c-4926-a148-2b04aa12f1bd/jobs/26094/steps shows that run 8 of a stability test run for fullstack failed with
Rerun 8 of 20 …
[13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 16/? # javascript console output: [
# {
# level => "SEVERE",
# message => "http://localhost:51401/asset/e27d1d8f48/ws_console.js 8 WebSocket connection to 'ws://127.0.0.1:20013/2isr2XBHNQjfDfPH/ws' failed: Error in connection establishment: net::ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED",
# source => "javascript",
# timestamp => 1588859690293,
# },
# ]
# Failed test 'no errors or warnings on javascript console, waiting for connection opened'
# at /home/squamata/project/t/lib/OpenQA/SeleniumTest.pm line 260.
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 7.
[13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 17/?
# Failed test 'wait until developer console becomes available'
# at t/full-stack.t line 144.
[13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 18/? [13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 19/? [13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 24/? [13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 25/? [13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 26/? [13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 27/? [13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 30/? [13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 31/? [13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 32/? [13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 34/? [13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 36/? [13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 42/? [13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 47/? [13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. 50/? # Looks like you failed 1 test of 51.
[13:54:31] t/full-stack.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/51 subtests
also we still have "RETRY=3" for full-stack.t and of course for others.
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
Recent instabilities have been introduced and fixed by mkittler, e.g. the modules details ajax route. So we can reconduct tests again and collect current state.
Trying to come back to t/05-scheduler-full.t which seems to be a problem more often lately after I added a change to prevent perl trying to access an undefined hash. The problem is that this caused a hard crash which gave an opportunity to terminate the test early. Now the test is stuck waiting for the workers which continue to run until the CI job times out so the retry on the level of the Makefile has no effect.
I prepared a change to move the complete process handling to IPC::Run to help with that but there seems to be a different underlying, scheduling related problem. In my branch "fix/scheduler3" I try to fix them. Using https://github.com/okurz/scripts/blob/master/count_fail_ratio I conducted another measurement to find out the fail ratio:
fails=0; for i in {1..20}; do echo "## Run $i" && env SCHEDULER_FULLSTACK=1 FULLSTACK=1 KEEP_DB=1 STABILITY_TEST=1 OPENQA_SCHEDULER_TEST_UNSTABLE_COUNT=10 OPENQA_SCHEDULER_TEST_UNRESPONSIVE_COUNT=10 DIE_ON_FAIL=1 timeout --foreground -v 60 prove -l t/05-scheduler-full.t || fails=$((fails+1)); echo "run:$i. fails: $fails. fail ratio $((fails * 100/i))"; done
yields run:20. fails: 11. fail ratio 55% with all fails in "one job allocated' at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 139." so I can shortcut the test to just this parts or also rework some other parts first but count the fail ratio again to ensure I have not introduced other problems as well.
https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/3109 for a first fix. After that – as one can see that I reached the branch name "fix/scheduler5" already – I have multiple additional changes planned, including better process handling with IPC::Run.
EDIT: 2020-05-28: Finally managed to extract one further big part out of my always-wip branch into https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/3123 for more use of IPC::Run and then I can continue with the next parts.
Updated by livdywan over 4 years ago
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
Well, I had mentioned that already in before :)
So that one was merged. Next in line:
- https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/3132 for various cleanup
- https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/3134 to fix "Connection refused" problems due to occupied ports
As expected there are still a lot of problems in 05-scheduler-full but the first problems have been fixed. Another problem I have seen:
[07:31:04] t/ui/26-jobs_restart.t ................. 2/?
# Failed test 'job is marked as restarted'
# at t/ui/26-jobs_restart.t line 126.
# got: 'minimalx@32bit'
# expected: 'minimalx@32bit (restarted)'
Bailout called. Further testing stopped: findChildElement: no such element: Unable to locate element: {"method":"xpath","selector":"./a[@title='new test']"} at /home/squamata/project/t/ui/../lib/OpenQA/SeleniumTest.pm:103
FAILED--Further testing stopped: findChildElement: no such element: Unable to locate element: {"method":"xpath","selector":"./a[@title='new test']"} at /home/squamata/project/t/ui/../lib/OpenQA/SeleniumTest.pm:103
as well as locally in a stability run of full-stack.t:
Rerun 6 of 20 …
t/full-stack.t ............................ 95/? # javascript console output: [
# {
# level => "WARNING",
# message => "http://localhost:9526/asset/574a6e9f06/test_result.js 234 WebSocket connection to 'ws://localhost:9528/liveviewhandler/tests/6/developer/ws-proxy/status' failed: WebSocket is closed before the connection is established.",
# source => "javascript",
# timestamp => 1590825943951,
# },
# {
# level => "WARNING",
# message => "http://localhost:9526/asset/574a6e9f06/test_result.js 234 WebSocket connection to 'ws://localhost:9528/liveviewhandler/tests/6/developer/ws-proxy/status' failed: WebSocket is closed before the connection is established.",
# source => "javascript",
# timestamp => 1590825943954,
# },
# ]
t/full-stack.t ............................ ok
t/05-scheduler-full.t ..................... ok
t/33-developer_mode.t ..................... ok
t/43-scheduling-and-worker-scalability.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=4, Tests=151, 290 wallclock secs ( 1.06 usr 0.07 sys + 123.64 cusr 19.83 csys = 144.60 CPU)
Result: PASS
…
152, 263 wallclock secs ( 1.02 usr 0.08 sys + 122.16 cusr 19.43 csys = 142.69 CPU)
Result: PASS
Rerun 10 of 20 …
t/full-stack.t ............................ 96/? # javascript console output: [
# {
# level => "WARNING",
# message => "http://localhost:9526/asset/574a6e9f06/test_result.js 272 WebSocket connection to 'ws://localhost:9528/liveviewhandler/tests/6/developer/ws-proxy/status' failed: WebSocket is closed before the connection is established.",
# source => "javascript",
# timestamp => 1590827059683,
# },
# ]
t/full-stack.t ............................ ok
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/3168 for currently unstable t/ui/26-jobs_restart.t
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
- Related to action #68836: t/api/14-plugin_obs_rsync_async.t fails sporadically in OBS added
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/os-autoinst/openQA/3638/workflows/a58744db-c263-427b-9ea7-6553f90f3fe4/jobs/34661/steps is an example of t/43-scheduling-and-worker-scalability.t still being unstable. The flakyness is covered by the workaround with retries so far.
Updated by livdywan about 4 years ago
Could you give us an update on the status of this? Maybe also add a real description instead of a merged PR.
Updated by okurz about 4 years ago
Reproduced instability in t/05-scheduler-full.t which happens very seldomly, see https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/3403#issuecomment-695212629 showing
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 3/?
# Failed test 'Allocated maximum number of jobs that could have been allocated'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 241.
# got: '9'
# expected: '10'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 1.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 4/?
# Failed test 'Simulation of heavy unstable load'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 277.
Died at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 241.
# Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not seen.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/4 subtests
Reproduced with env runs=100 count_fail_ratio prove -l t/05-scheduler-full.t
where it shows up exactly once (!).
Running time env runs=400 count_fail_ratio prove -l t/05-scheduler-full.t
reproduced the issue 2 times, one other failure. The overall run took 215m.
Have done the same again on lord.arch:
$ time env runs=400 count_fail_ratio prove -l t/05-scheduler-full.
…
## count_fail_ratio: Run: 400. Fails: 5. Fail ratio 1%
real 414m38.126s
4 times the test ran into the timeout of 150s and only once it produced:
## Run 279
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 3/?
# Failed test 'Allocated maximum number of jobs that could have been allocated'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 241.
# got: '9'
# expected: '10'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 1.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. 4/?
# Failed test 'Simulation of heavy unstable load'
# at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 277.
Died at t/05-scheduler-full.t line 241.
# Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not seen.
t/05-scheduler-full.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/4 subtests
Test Summary Report
-------------------
So around 1/400 runs reproduces the issue.
Created specific ticket #72085 for this.
Updated by okurz about 4 years ago
- Related to action #71554: unstable/flaky/sporadic t/full-stack.t test failing in script waits on CircleCI added
Updated by okurz about 4 years ago
- Copied to action #72085: flaky/unstable t/05-scheduler-full.t, Failed test 'Allocated maximum number of jobs that could have been allocated' added
Updated by okurz about 4 years ago
- Target version changed from Current Sprint to Ready
Updated by okurz about 4 years ago
- Related to action #76900: unstable/flaky/sporadic t/full-stack.t test failing in CircleCI "worker did not propagate URL for os-autoinst cmd srv within 1 minute" added
Updated by okurz almost 4 years ago
- Copied to action #88496: openQA "t" tests time out (again) and take long added
Updated by okurz almost 4 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from Blocked to Resolved
Hm, I think we should have kept the original focus for this test and not try to extend it endlessly. I should have known that there will likely always be some unstable tests :/ The original problem in t/fullstack.t is long fixed.