Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #48128

closed

[functional][y] Improve our automatic detection of "no license is shown but expected" and vice versa

Added by okurz about 5 years ago. Updated about 5 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
High
Assignee:
Category:
Bugs in existing tests
Target version:
SUSE QA - Milestone 24
Start date:
2019-01-24
Due date:
2019-03-26
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
5.00 h
Difficulty:

Description

Motivation

In #46613 we needed to handle again one of the common cases that a license is not shown when one is expected (or vice versa). Rodion created bsc#1123057 which also took some rather wasteful steps until the right assignee was reached and the OBS time synced the missing file (or folder). We would like to handle issues like these more efficiently.
In the logs we can check eula_url.

Acceptance criteria

  • AC1: At least a post_fail_hook can provide hints what is missing, e.g. file/folder missing in OBS repo
  • AC2: The team understood when to expect licenses, e.g. to report better bugs

Suggestion

We also could check if product/extension is enabled on scc.suse.com
Find out if we can find or provide hint to the OBS/IBS project which contains license files.
Document the way how to investigate missing license issues and ideally show those hints in openQA. Alternative (easy way out): Tell the team in the ticket or sprint review meeting.

Further details

Always latest result in this scenario: latest


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Copied from openQA Tests - action #46613: [functional][y] test fails in yast_scc for postreg with sdk - no license is shownResolvedmloviska2019-01-242019-03-12

Actions
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF