action #46613
closed[functional][y] test fails in yast_scc for postreg with sdk - no license is shown
0%
Description
Observation¶
We have an issue with test as we use regurl for server only, and url for sdk is not replaced by the proxy scc.
NOTE: test was moved to the YaST job group
openQA test in scenario yast_scc fails in
yast_scc
Reproducible¶
Fails since (at least) Build 0114
Expected result¶
Last good: (unknown) (or more recent)
Further details¶
Always latest result in this scenario: latest
Suggestions¶
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123057 is resolved fixed, but behavior is still the same. So we need to verify how it worked with SLE12 SP4.
In this scenario SDK is added as addon, but SUT is unregistered, it might affect expectations we set.
Updated by riafarov about 5 years ago
- Assignee set to riafarov
Seems that will be enough to add correct SCC_URL to the parent test suite, generating image: https://openqa.suse.de/tests/2399557
Updated by riafarov about 5 years ago
I've fixed regurl part, now we expect license, but it's not shown. Again can be some broken setup as we have SDK already installed, so not sure how registration will work...
Updated by riafarov about 5 years ago
- Subject changed from [functional][y] test fails in yast_scc for postreg with sdk, wrong reg url is used to [functional][y] test fails in yast_scc for postreg with sdk - no license is shown
- Status changed from Workable to Blocked
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123057 waiting for the reply in the bug.
Updated by okurz about 5 years ago
This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:
This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: minimal+base+sdk+proxy_SCC-postreg
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/2422494
Updated by riafarov about 5 years ago
- Due date changed from 2019-02-26 to 2019-03-12
- Status changed from Blocked to Workable
- Assignee deleted (
riafarov)
Bug is fixed, but behavior hasn't been changed, so we need to take a look and reopen if needed.
Updated by okurz about 5 years ago
- Priority changed from Normal to High
bumping to "High" as linked to currently failing job.
Updated by riafarov about 5 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
- Estimated time set to 5.00 h
Updated by okurz about 5 years ago
- Copied to action #48128: [functional][y] Improve our automatic detection of "no license is shown but expected" and vice versa added
Updated by mloviska about 5 years ago
Maybe we should link this job to its parent. sle-12-SP5-Server-DVD-x86_64-Build0122-create_hdd_minimal_base+sdk@64bit.
Updated by mloviska about 5 years ago
- Status changed from Workable to In Progress
- Assignee set to mloviska
Updated by mloviska about 5 years ago
I have found two failed runs on s390x from sle12sp4, which are not helpful.
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/1556955#next_previous
And that should be all. There is nothing else in openqa and auditlog does not show any record related to x86_64 arch.
Updated by mloviska about 5 years ago
I am creating image with http://Server-0122.SDK-0089.proxy.scc.suse.de sle-12-SP5-Server-DVD-x86_64-Build0122-create_hdd_minimal_base+sdk@64bit. Later I will try to run the yast_scc test suite
Updated by mloviska about 5 years ago
Alright, so this is the issue https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/blob/master/tests/console/yast_scc.pm#L29
Updated by mloviska about 5 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Blocked
Reopened. eula_url is still empty
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123057
Updated by riafarov about 5 years ago
- Status changed from Blocked to Resolved
Let's resolve it. We won't need test adjustment as it's a bug. So well done, thanks for your findings.
Updated by okurz about 5 years ago
This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:
This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: sles+sdk+proxy_SCC_via_YaST
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/2450647
Updated by okurz about 5 years ago
This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:
This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: sles+sdk+proxy_SCC_via_YaST
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/2506909