action #32848
closedCheck for subvolumes present for home directory in case no separate partition
0%
Description
Acceptance criteria¶
- AC1: /home subvolumes presence is validated in case of no separate home partition is proposed
Tasks¶
- Research if we do not already have a test module covering subvolume checks
- Add simple check of mount points vs. expectations, e.g. start with @/home as an example based on TOGGLEHOME, see bsc#1084261
Further details¶
We already have a test for subvolumes in the installer with a needle check as well as console/installation_snapshots
that at least fails when there are no subvolumes.
We need to find scenario where we explicitly use btrfs and no separate home partition (if doesn't exist - create it), and check that there is subvolume for the /home path. For the check we also have some functionality available, so can reuse it.
Updated by okurz almost 7 years ago
- Related to action #32704: [sle][functional][yast] test fails to verify mount point for btrfs subvolumes fstab entry added
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Target version changed from Milestone 17 to Milestone 21+
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
bsc#1097235 "/boot/grub2/arm64-efi is not a btrfs subvolume" is a bug that could be covered by this "new test"
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Subject changed from [functional][u][userspace][medium]Check for subvolumes present/not-present to [functional][u][medium]Check for subvolumes present/not-present
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Target version changed from Milestone 21+ to Milestone 21+
Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago
- Target version changed from Milestone 21+ to Milestone 25
Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago
- Priority changed from Normal to Low
- Target version changed from Milestone 25 to future
Let's focus a bit more on fixing and enhancing our current test base before continuing further with "New test". Putting to "holding tank" :)
Updated by szarate over 4 years ago
- Assignee set to riafarov
@Rodion, will you be interested in picking this ticket up? While valid, I don't see much value
Updated by riafarov over 4 years ago
- Subject changed from [functional][u][medium]Check for subvolumes present/not-present to [functional][y][medium]Check for subvolumes present/not-present
- Assignee deleted (
riafarov)
szarate wrote:
@Rodion, will you be interested in picking this ticket up? While valid, I don't see much value
we already have some validation, but we don't have explicit checks for the scenario without separate home partition. So I will put in our backlog. Cheers.
Updated by riafarov about 4 years ago
- Project changed from openQA Tests (public) to qe-yam
- Subject changed from [functional][y][medium]Check for subvolumes present/not-present to Check for subvolumes present/not-present for home partition
- Category deleted (
New test)
Updated by riafarov almost 4 years ago
- Subject changed from Check for subvolumes present/not-present for home partition to Check for subvolumes present for home directory in case no separate partition
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from New to Workable
Updated by syrianidou_sofia almost 4 years ago
- Status changed from Workable to In Progress
- Assignee set to syrianidou_sofia
Updated by syrianidou_sofia almost 4 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
Updated by syrianidou_sofia almost 4 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
OSD runs for 148.1 pass