Project

General

Profile

action #32848

[functional][y][medium]Check for subvolumes present/not-present

Added by okurz over 2 years ago. Updated 3 months ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
-
Category:
New test
Target version:
Start date:
2018-03-07
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Difficulty:
Duration:

Description

Acceptance criteria

  • AC1: Subvolumes presence is checked based on test settings in at least two scenarios with differing test parameters, e.g. TOGGLEHOME
  • AC2: Test for bsc#1084261 exists

Tasks

  • Research if we do not already have a test module covering subvolume checks
  • Add simple check of mount points vs. expectations, e.g. start with @/home as an example based on TOGGLEHOME, see bsc#1084261

Further details

We already have a test for subvolumes in the installer with a needle check as well as console/installation_snapshots that at least fails when there are no subvolumes.


Related issues

Related to openQA Tests - action #32704: [sle][functional][yast] test fails to verify mount point for btrfs subvolumes fstab entryResolved2018-03-022018-04-10

History

#1 Updated by okurz over 2 years ago

  • Related to action #32704: [sle][functional][yast] test fails to verify mount point for btrfs subvolumes fstab entry added

#2 Updated by okurz about 2 years ago

  • Target version changed from Milestone 17 to Milestone 21+

#3 Updated by okurz about 2 years ago

bsc#1097235 "/boot/grub2/arm64-efi is not a btrfs subvolume" is a bug that could be covered by this "new test"

#4 Updated by okurz about 2 years ago

  • Subject changed from [functional][u][userspace][medium]Check for subvolumes present/not-present to [functional][u][medium]Check for subvolumes present/not-present

#5 Updated by okurz about 2 years ago

  • Target version changed from Milestone 21+ to Milestone 21+

#6 Updated by okurz over 1 year ago

  • Target version changed from Milestone 21+ to Milestone 25

#7 Updated by okurz over 1 year ago

  • Priority changed from Normal to Low
  • Target version changed from Milestone 25 to future

Let's focus a bit more on fixing and enhancing our current test base before continuing further with "New test". Putting to "holding tank" :)

#8 Updated by szarate 3 months ago

  • Assignee set to riafarov

@Rodion, will you be interested in picking this ticket up? While valid, I don't see much value

#9 Updated by riafarov 3 months ago

  • Subject changed from [functional][u][medium]Check for subvolumes present/not-present to [functional][y][medium]Check for subvolumes present/not-present
  • Assignee deleted (riafarov)

szarate wrote:

@Rodion, will you be interested in picking this ticket up? While valid, I don't see much value

we already have some validation, but we don't have explicit checks for the scenario without separate home partition. So I will put in our backlog. Cheers.

Also available in: Atom PDF