action #1789
closed
- Priority changed from Normal to High
- Category set to 124
- Target version set to Easy hacks
- Priority changed from High to Normal
In which project exactly do you want to gather test coverage? openQA itself gathers some coverage, see badge here: https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA#openqa--
What I would like to do is gather coverage for os-autoinst itself, at best locally as well as with coveralls.io . Do you have anything else in mind?
the issue is two years old. might well be that I was referring to openQA itself. os-autoinst would be good of course.
Also reminds me that the coveralls hook to github is broken since monthgs. Who has the coveralls account data?
- Related to action #10262: Prevent further test coverage drop added
How is it broken? I just logged in coveralls and it seems it works fine for openQA. Fine in sense it does something on each commit/PR.
Situation improved a bit with https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/513
We can enable hard check by setting a threshold in .travis.yml at least for openQA, os-autoinst needs to be done as well as tests distribution itself if this is feasible. coveralls got reconfigured by oholecek but still stays silent
- Status changed from New to Resolved
we have a coverage check with threshold plus the coveralls reports working for openQA. Since that, the test coverage improved a lot already.
Also available in: Atom
PDF