Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #15148

closed

coordination #9486: [sle][opensuse][functional][epic][y]Network Installations

[sle][functional][y] Network Installations - HTTPS

Added by okurz about 8 years ago. Updated over 6 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
High
Assignee:
Category:
New test
Target version:
SUSE QA (private) - Milestone 18
Start date:
2016-11-30
Due date:
2018-09-11
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Difficulty:

Description

Acceptance criteria

#34108


Related issues 2 (0 open2 closed)

Copied from openQA Tests (public) - action #15146: Network Installations - FTP/HTTP/NFSResolvedmkravec2016-11-30

Actions
Copied to openQA Tests (public) - action #34108: [sle][functional][y] Network Installations - remote installation over https with self-signed certificateResolvedriafarov2016-11-302018-09-11

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by okurz about 8 years ago

  • Copied from action #15146: Network Installations - FTP/HTTP/NFS added
Actions #2

Updated by okurz about 8 years ago

  • Assignee set to maritawerner

Please check if HTTPS is a supported scenario.

Actions #3

Updated by zluo about 8 years ago

https? We haven't supported this protocol for manual installation over network.

Actions #4

Updated by okurz about 8 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Feedback

yes, you are right. It looks like this was never supported, e.g. never mentioned on http://docserv.suse.de/documents/SLES12-SP2/SLES-deployment/ . The only fate entries which I could find which mention https at all regarding SLE are https://fate.suse.com/320130 and https://fate.suse.com/320129 where on both the discussion is ongoing (and recent) how it should look like for SP3 so let's wait a bit and maybe it will be resolved then

Actions #5

Updated by okurz about 8 years ago

  • Subject changed from Network Installations - HTTPS to [blocked:fate#320130] Network Installations - HTTPS
Actions #6

Updated by maritawerner almost 8 years ago

  • Assignee deleted (maritawerner)
  • Priority changed from Low to High

Clarified with Anja: we need to test that. Priority is high since the parent ticket has priority high as well.

Actions #7

Updated by mkravec almost 8 years ago

https://fate.suse.com/320130 was rejected for SLE12-SP3 and evaluation was moved to SLE13. Can we close this issue?

Actions #8

Updated by maritawerner almost 8 years ago

According to Oli that Feature is not related to the task to install over https. Any expert advice is welcome here.

Actions #9

Updated by okurz almost 8 years ago

maritawerner wrote:

According to Oli that Feature is not related to the task to install over https.

The fate entries talk about 'https boot', i.e. booting the kernel and installer over https and not downloading packages from within the installer with https.

So there are two different features to discuss:

@maritawerner: agreed?

Actions #10

Updated by maritawerner over 7 years ago

Let me double check with Frederic/Anja if they are fine with testing only on openSUSE or if we need to add SLES later.

Actions #11

Updated by okurz about 7 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to In Progress
  • Target version set to Milestone 12

so https://fate.suse.com/320130 has been rejected for all relevant products but a submission to openSUSE:Factory had been made so worth to try

Actions #12

Updated by okurz about 7 years ago

  • Subject changed from [blocked:fate#320130] Network Installations - HTTPS to [blocked:fate#320130][sle][functional] Network Installations - HTTPS
Actions #13

Updated by okurz about 7 years ago

  • Subject changed from [blocked:fate#320130][sle][functional] Network Installations - HTTPS to [sle][functional] Network Installations - HTTPS
  • Target version changed from Milestone 12 to Milestone 14

actually not blocked then so we could start

Actions #14

Updated by okurz almost 7 years ago

  • Due date set to 2018-03-13
Actions #15

Updated by okurz almost 7 years ago

  • Due date deleted (2018-03-13)
  • Target version changed from Milestone 14 to Milestone 17

M14 is too full. Better we focus more on fixing.

Actions #16

Updated by okurz over 6 years ago

  • Copied to action #34108: [sle][functional][y] Network Installations - remote installation over https with self-signed certificate added
Actions #17

Updated by okurz over 6 years ago

  • Subject changed from [sle][functional] Network Installations - HTTPS to [sle][functional][u] Network Installations - HTTPS
  • Description updated (diff)
  • Due date set to 2018-08-28
  • Status changed from In Progress to Workable
  • Target version changed from Milestone 17 to Milestone 18

should follow #34108

Actions #18

Updated by okurz over 6 years ago

  • Target version changed from Milestone 18 to Milestone 18
Actions #19

Updated by dheidler over 6 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Assignee set to okurz

please clarify relation to #34108

Actions #20

Updated by okurz over 6 years ago

  • Subject changed from [sle][functional][u] Network Installations - HTTPS to [sle][functional][y] Network Installations - HTTPS
  • Status changed from Workable to Blocked

#34108 should be done first, then this one.

Actions #21

Updated by riafarov over 6 years ago

  • Due date changed from 2018-08-28 to 2018-09-11

Will get unblocked soon, we should also discuss it, as we cover https with self-signed cert on osd and with trusted on o3.

Actions #22

Updated by maritawerner over 6 years ago

Hi Rodion, I saw that you discussed that topic in the IRC recently. I got the request to test that really a long time ago, I have no further input here.

Actions #23

Updated by riafarov over 6 years ago

Right, I see that ticket is quite old. Following fate is mentioned https://fate.suse.com/320130 and I believe that in #34108 we are addressing different component. Therefore, I would like to clarify it when okurz is back from vacation before we invest a lot of efforts in the test which wasn't requested.

Actions #24

Updated by riafarov over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Blocked to Resolved

As per comment in #34108

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF