QA (public) » openQA Project (public)

Observation¶

I was using openqa-advanced-retrigger-jobs to retrigger failed jobs and also include a comment

1. See how https://openqa.suse.de/tests/12753455#comments has a comment Re-running to verify connection with poo#138698
2. See how the clone has a takeover message https://openqa.suse.de/tests/12754970#comments
3. See how the build also includes the "bugref" https://openqa.suse.de/tests/overview?groupid=439&distri=sle&version=15-SP4&build=%3A31277%3Apostgresql

As far as I was aware bugs/tickets/issues must be separate or they won't be treated as bugrefs. I'm not sure if this is a regression. It caught me by surprise at the least.

Acceptance criteria¶

• AC1: It is clear from the docs how bugref semantics work

Suggestions¶

• Confirm if this behavior is a regression
• Add documentation to clarify the behavior - it seems like we don't have any specific examples that would help find out if this was expected or not
• Decide if this is desirable or not, and change the code accordingly
• Consider #136244 which is also discussing the semantics of bugrefs