QA » openQA Project

Just to clarify a bit, I don't think this is exactly a regression, but rather, it's a difference between isos post and jobs post.

When we added the _URL stuff - all the way back in https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/426 - we didn't put it in the jobs post path at all (if job posting was actually a thing back then, I'm not sure). It has always worked as intended in ISO posting (which is how we, Fedora, mostly use it).

Then back in 2018, okurz added the asset download feature to jobs post in this commit: https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/commit/2c27c9070637ffd6bce0b1e181c51a06cfa9a1a4 - before that commit the jobs post path just didn't try and do asset downloads at all - but got the ordering a bit wrong, as I explained in https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/2877#issuecomment-614331728 .

So I don't think this has ever actually worked on the jobs post path - until 2c27c907 that path just didn't attempt asset downloads at all, and since 2c27c907 that path has done asset downloads but because of the ordering problem it only works if the FOO value is explicitly set as well as FOO_URL.

This probably hasn't been noticed till now as we (Fedora) have been the main users of the _URL stuff and we just don't use jobs post much, we always schedule via isos post.

https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/3049