Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #55568

closed

openQA Infrastructure (public) - action #55178: ** PROBLEM Service Alert: openqa.suse.de/fs_/var/lib/openqa is WARNING **

openQA Tests (public) - coordination #55556: [epic][osd][functional][u] osd: Untracked assets that most likely should be tracked

[jeos][osd] Untracked assets that most likely should be tracked: JeOS

Added by okurz over 5 years ago. Updated about 2 months ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
High
Assignee:
Target version:
-
Start date:
2019-08-15
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Observation

The space available on osd is limited. https://openqa.suse.de/admin/assets reveals some assets as "untracked" but probably they should be tracked by jobs, for example the following subset:

hdd/SLES15-SP2-JeOS.x86_64-15.2-VMware-Build2.8.vmdk.xz 147.94 MiB
hdd/SLES15-SP1-JeOS.x86_64-15.1-VMware-Build35.30.vmdk.xz 148.15 MiB
hdd/SLES15-JeOS.x86_64-15.0-XEN-Build25.1.qcow2 260.38 MiB
hdd/SLES15-JeOS.x86_64-15.0-MS-HyperV-Build25.1.vhdx 872 MiB
hdd/SLES15-JeOS.x86_64-15.0-kvm-and-xen-Build25.1.qcow2 260.38 MiB
hdd/SLES12-SP5-JeOS.x86_64-12.5-VMware-Build4.34.vmdk.xz 156.31 MiB
hdd/SLES12-SP4-JeOS.x86_64-12.4-VMware-Build10.30.vmdk 807.56 MiB
Actions #1

Updated by okurz over 5 years ago

  • Subject changed from osd: Untracked assets that most likely should be tracked: JeOS to [jeos][osd] Untracked assets that most likely should be tracked: JeOS
Actions #2

Updated by okurz over 5 years ago

  • Assignee set to runger

I can't find acotofana in the progress project, I will assign to @runger. I hope you are ok with that and can help to re-assign to the right person then

Actions #3

Updated by okurz over 5 years ago

  • Copied to action #55571: [osd][staging][sle] Untracked assets that most likely should be tracked: SLE staging added
Actions #4

Updated by okurz over 5 years ago

  • Copied to deleted (action #55571: [osd][staging][sle] Untracked assets that most likely should be tracked: SLE staging)
Actions #5

Updated by okurz over 5 years ago

  • Assignee changed from runger to mloviska

@acotofana helped to find the responsible person, it's mloviska but we might need a vacation standin

Actions #6

Updated by okurz about 5 years ago

situation on osd unchanged. @mloviska would you be able to look into this? Should be as simple as referencing the needed JeOS assets in the test scenarios. If they are not needed consider moving the syncing and triggering to "OBS Sync", @andriinikitin can help, or do not even sync the assets or look into https://gitlab.suse.de/openqa/scripts/blob/master/rsync.pl#L245 which can provide a way to delete assets even after syncing.

Actions #7

Updated by okurz about 5 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Feedback
  • Assignee changed from mloviska to okurz
  • Target version set to Current Sprint
Actions #8

Updated by okurz about 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved

merged and done

Actions #9

Updated by jlausuch almost 4 years ago

  • Project changed from openQA Tests (public) to 208
  • Category deleted (Bugs in existing tests)
Actions #10

Updated by ph03nix about 2 months ago

  • Tags set to MinimalVM
Actions #11

Updated by ph03nix about 2 months ago

  • Project changed from 208 to Containers and images
  • Target version deleted (Current Sprint)
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF