action #33274
closed[functional][y] Reproduce bsc#1017558 "Cannot view timestamp of read-only snapshots in GRUB as names truncated"
Added by okurz over 6 years ago. Updated over 5 years ago.
0%
Description
Observation¶
openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-boot_to_snapshot@64bit in
grub_test does not show the boot menu entries but we would like to see them to be able to reproduce bsc#1017558
Tasks¶
- DONE: Show screens with
save_screenshot - Reproduce bsc#1017558 with automatic test
- Optional: Convert
save_screenshottoassert_screenand add bug detection tracker needle with workaround property pointing to bug - Motivate work on bug when we can confirm it on SLE as well
Further details¶
Always latest result in this scenario: latest
Files
| tw_snapshots.png (9.68 KB) tw_snapshots.png | mloviska, 2018-07-18 15:13 | ||
| scrn.png (8.51 KB) scrn.png | mloviska, 2018-07-18 15:13 | ||
| scrn_after_install.png (8.71 KB) scrn_after_install.png | mloviska, 2018-07-18 15:13 |
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
PR merged, https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/634073 triggered to check the screenshots
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/634077#step/grub_test/6 shows the situation on openSUSE Tumbleweed, the text is clearly truncated but obviously there is more unused screen space available.
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/1543487 scheduled for SLE15
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
Actually we are lucky for SLE because it's abbreviated "SLES15" so the whole string matches on the available space: https://openqa.suse.de/tests/1543487#step/grub_test/6
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
- Category changed from Bugs in existing tests to New test
- Status changed from In Progress to Workable
- Assignee deleted (
okurz)
First step is done, next steps can be conducted as mentioned in the description.
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Due date deleted (
2018-05-08) - Target version changed from Milestone 16 to Milestone 17
ok, can wait a bit longer, S16 is full.
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Subject changed from [functional][u]Reproduce bsc#1017558 "Cannot view timestamp of read-only snapshots in GRUB as names truncated" to [functional][y] Reproduce bsc#1017558 "Cannot view timestamp of read-only snapshots in GRUB as names truncated"
- Due date set to 2018-07-17
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Target version changed from Milestone 17 to Milestone 17
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Target version changed from Milestone 17 to Milestone 18
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Due date changed from 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-31
It's hackweek time!
Updated by mloviska over 6 years ago
- Assignee set to mloviska
Updated by mloviska over 6 years ago
- File tw_snapshots.png tw_snapshots.png added
- File scrn.png scrn.png added
- File scrn_after_install.png scrn_after_install.png added
Timestamps are present in Build20180713.
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
Hm, looking at the latest Tumbleweed test https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/7088820 I can find that the snapshot names are actually not displayed as screenshots within openQA. It looks like the whole menu of snapshots is not there.
@mloviska I wonder how did you generate the screenshots and why? The screenshots should be recorded by openQA. And just for clarification: The original bug – see the subject line – is not about the timestamps not being visible at all but truncated, i.e. they are not fully visible because they are cut from the right side. This is not a problem for SLE as noted in #33274#note-5 but only for openSUSE.
Updated by mloviska over 6 years ago
@okurz, manual test. As long as there is only 1 snapshot, sublist is not displayed.
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
ah, I see. So even that behaviour changed. https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/634077#step/grub_test/6 showed the situation – including the bug – from 4 months ago, mentioned in #33274#note-4
Updated by mloviska over 6 years ago
We can reproduce the issue on Leap 15.1. Since issue is not touching SLE and TW has changed its behavior, I am not really sure what should be our next step with this ticket.
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
As recommended in the ticket description I would go for making https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/715084#step/grub_test/6 a check which we can then soft-fail referencing the bug. It should be enough to have this issue on openSUSE Leap but to further motivate, maybe we can find a SLE product where this happens as well, but just not SLES itself. Maybe "SLES for SAP" is longer?
Updated by mloviska over 6 years ago
- Status changed from Workable to Feedback
Updated by riafarov over 6 years ago
- Due date changed from 2018-07-31 to 2018-08-14
Updated by riafarov over 6 years ago
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/717024#step/grub_test/6
@okurz, please review, if you're fine with resolving it.
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
yes, nice. So my one concern did not turn into reality ;) Please see about the other (two?) points though
Updated by mloviska over 6 years ago
I am not really convinced that we are talking about recent builds only, since the behavior changes have been recorded in openQA for few months https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/677094#step/grub_test/5.
The second point, it would be nice to recognize some string which is enclosed in brackets by a needle. According to the bug, grub can display only limited amount of characters in certain resolution. The same issue was with leap 15.0 GM, thus when this bug is going to be resolved fix, we can just easily remove current workaround.
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
What workaround do you mean, the record_soft_failure?
Could you please also relate to my comment Nr. 19
Updated by mloviska over 6 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
Feel free to create a separate ticket for other sles products. :)
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
No, this is not how it works. I repeatedly tell that I if people prefer to close off tickets and continue the work in new tickets I consider this useless additional buerocrazy but I will go with it. However, accepting that we just do parts of what has been noted down and openly ignoring open points which have been stated already in the initial description – so no scope creep – I consider as not nice. Again: Feel free to keep the ticket open, unassign or clone into a new ticket but please do not just call it as resolved when we state that it is not. Feel free to bring it up again in the next retro or with your SM as well.
Updated by mloviska over 6 years ago
- Assignee deleted (
mloviska)
Initial description does not states anything regarding other SLE products (SAP etc.) as well as there are not in functional openQA group.
Updated by riafarov over 6 years ago
- Status changed from Workable to Resolved
@okurz I believe that it's overkill to detect truncated snapshot name with needle, so, I've commented that we have same issue on SLE 12 SP4, provided screenshot. If you still believe it's not enough and would like to have precise check of bug existence, I will escalate this issue as I don't see anything to be done here except parts which are already done, and I strongly believe that we don't have resources for such unimportant issues. Feel free to re-open.
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
- Assignee changed from riafarov to okurz
I really would like to understand better why you urge to keep it closed. Is it OK for you to keep it assigned to myself then until we can clarify how I can improve the description, how another ticket can track it better or what we should do? The bug is important to me and openQA is a very feasible way to show it hence this issue
Updated by riafarov over 6 years ago
okurz wrote:
I really would like to understand better why you urge to keep it closed. Is it OK for you to keep it assigned to myself then until we can clarify how I can improve the description, how another ticket can track it better or what we should do? The bug is important to me and openQA is a very feasible way to show it hence this issue
I guess that's the main issue here, as you have mentioned that it's important for you. I guess we should discuss how far we should get, but I don't believe that bugs get self-resolved, so sending automated 'up' comments do not help here imho. So, let's discuss in more details, as it's a good topic and if we would add soft-failures to all existing bugs then.
Updated by riafarov over 6 years ago
- Due date deleted (
2018-08-14) - Target version changed from Milestone 18 to future
As per discussion, need to reconsider.
Updated by okurz about 6 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Blocked
ok, we have since 2018-07 an unconditional "record_soft_failure" referencing https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017558 "if is_leap" which is not perfect but at least reminds about the bug ;) Also we have a SLE15SP1 feature request now so I would say we should wait for #41279 first.
Updated by okurz over 5 years ago
- Assignee changed from okurz to riafarov
Move to new QSF-y PO after I moved to the "tools"-team. I mainly checked the subject line so in individual instances you might not agree to take it over completely into QSF-y. Feel free to reassign to me or someone else in this case. Thanks.
Updated by riafarov over 5 years ago
- Status changed from Blocked to Resolved
Bug is fixed, unconditional soft failure was removed: https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/7318
In case issue exists in older versions, we should use needles with bug references.