action #26108
closed[sle][functional][u][sporadic] test fails in btrfs_send_receive - checksum of snapshot does not match original checksum
0%
Description
Observation¶
Another consequence of script_output problem. Here we will try to work this problem around
Acceptance criteria¶
AC1: try to apply some hack to parse or get checksum
AC2: if not possible, add soft-failure when output doesn't match checksum mask
openQA test in scenario sle-15-Installer-DVD-ppc64le-extra_tests_filesystem_ppc@ppc64le fails in
btrfs_send_receive
Reproducible¶
Fails since (at least) Build 303.1 (current job)
Expected result¶
Checksums should match and test continue
Last good: 302.1 (or more recent)
Further details¶
Updated by riafarov about 6 years ago
- Has duplicate action #30613: [functional][y][hard] script_output might include extra serial output added
Updated by riafarov about 6 years ago
- Has duplicate deleted (action #30613: [functional][y][hard] script_output might include extra serial output)
Updated by riafarov about 6 years ago
- Related to action #30613: [functional][y][hard] script_output might include extra serial output added
Updated by riafarov about 6 years ago
- Subject changed from [sle][functional] test fails in btrfs_send_receive - checksum of snapshot does not match original checksum to [sle][functional][sporadic] test fails in btrfs_send_receive - checksum of snapshot does not match original checksum
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from New to Workable
Updated by mgriessmeier about 6 years ago
- Status changed from Workable to Blocked
- Assignee set to okurz
Updated by okurz about 6 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
- Due date deleted (
2018-03-13) - Priority changed from Normal to Low
- Target version changed from Milestone 14 to future
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/1496494#step/btrfs_send_receive/48 is the latest example still failing. Don't know what we can do here rather than wait for #30613 which is also not really progressing. I guess the best choice right now that we have is to go for virtio_terminals in all cases or live with a workaround which is improving the regexes used in test code to not be confused by different serial port output.
Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago
- Target version changed from future to future
Updated by okurz over 5 years ago
- Status changed from Blocked to Workable
- Assignee deleted (
okurz) - Target version changed from future to Milestone 19
blocker #30613 fixed
Updated by okurz over 5 years ago
- Subject changed from [sle][functional][sporadic] test fails in btrfs_send_receive - checksum of snapshot does not match original checksum to [sle][functional][u][sporadic] test fails in btrfs_send_receive - checksum of snapshot does not match original checksum
- Target version changed from Milestone 19 to Milestone 23
Updated by szarate about 5 years ago
- Status changed from Workable to Feedback
Seems to not have failed for quite some time: https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?flavor=Installer-DVD&test=extra_tests_filesystem&arch=ppc64le&machine=ppc64le&version=15-SP1&distri=sle#next_previous
I suggest to simply close this ticket. Setting to feedback for the time being, nevertheless the consideration of using virtio terminals should go to a separate ticket.
Updated by okurz about 5 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
- Assignee set to szarate
agreed