Actions
action #132446
closedReview how the SUSE QE Tools team does without moderation duty six weeks in size:M
Start date:
2023-07-07
Due date:
2023-08-18
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Tags:
Description
Review how the SUSE QE Tools team does without moderation duty six weeks in
Motivation¶
We voted in favor of experimentally dropping the moderation duty for a period of six weeks. As per usual we'll be reviewing the outcome after that time and draw conclusions. Did it help? Did it reveal gaps? Any surprising outcomes?
Acceptance criteria¶
- AC1: The SUSE QE Tools has a better understanding of how useful the moderation duty is in its current form ** AC2:** The team is stable able to fulfill expecations as documented on our wiki
Suggestions¶
- Update the moderation duty as described in the section Weekly moderation duty with a note that it's not being used for the time being
- Drop the moderation duty from the Slack topic
- Set a due date to ensure we remember to discuss this ticket when the time comes, either asynchronously, or the next retro at that time or a separate meeting
- Do a decision how to continue, with or w/o moderation duty or any alternatives that we could come up with
Updated by okurz over 1 year ago
- Subject changed from Review how the SUSE QE Tools team does without moderation duty six weeks in to Review how the SUSE QE Tools team does without moderation duty six weeks in size:M
- Description updated (diff)
Updated by livdywan about 1 year ago
I brought it up in the retro. Apparently we're doing pretty good without the moderation duty. I'm also being purposefully lenient with checking in on people. Let's see how we'll do in another two weeks from now.
Updated by livdywan about 1 year ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
Apparently we're good. The team's doing really well without the explicit moderation duty.
Actions