Project

General

Profile

action #12214

partitioning_raid is hard to debug on errors

Added by okurz over 5 years ago. Updated about 4 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Low
Category:
Enhancement to existing tests
Target version:
-
Start date:
2016-06-02
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Difficulty:

Description

observation

https://openqa.suse.de/tests/408800/modules/partitioning_raid/steps/120 - is this a timing issue with broken test or product issue?

steps to reproduce

Call a test_suite like "lvm+RAID1" and try to follow what steps exactly are executed when.

problem

logic in test is complicated.
okurz: IMHO it's a test issue paired with a unoptimal product behaviour. The test is going to "crypt lvm management" when it should create another raid partition instead but a problem is (or might be) that the previous dialog for creation of a RAID volume exits and the created RAID volume does not show up at once but only an instance later which could cause the confusion

suggestion

Add some "diag" calls or similar to easier follow the test procedure.

workaround

download videos and go through single frames, e.g. using smplayer with ',' and '.' shortcuts.


Related issues

Related to openQA Tests - action #18828: [tools][sles][functional] keystrokes are sometimes ignored on aarch64 in partitioning_raid testResolved2017-04-27

History

#1 Updated by okurz over 5 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#3 Updated by asmorodskyi about 4 years ago

  • Assignee set to SLindoMansilla

#4 Updated by SLindoMansilla about 4 years ago

  • Related to action #18828: [tools][sles][functional] keystrokes are sometimes ignored on aarch64 in partitioning_raid test added

#5 Updated by SLindoMansilla about 4 years ago

This should be fixed by https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/18828

(or at least we get better debug info)

#6 Updated by SLindoMansilla about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress

#7 Updated by SLindoMansilla about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Feedback

Waiting for this poo#18828 to be done.

#8 Updated by SLindoMansilla about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved

Added more coverage through assert screenshots:

poo#18828

Also available in: Atom PDF