QA (public) » openQA Project (public)

Brought up in the unblock. Why are we still confused on what the goal of the ticket is?

• https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/4458/commits/5c9a138ceb6dbf5492bb69ec6f71e77a73aa0869 Could be read to preclude what the AC ask for. But apparently that wasn't the intention of the author.
• We have no record of working examples vs non-working examples to disambiguate/ AT
• There's no comment confirming what Moritz was going to implement as per discussion on Jitsi

On top of that we clarified within the daily or unblock of 2022-02-23: We agreed that we have a regression and as stated in the description the assumption since #105370#note-1 is still true. https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/4458/commits/5c9a138ceb6dbf5492bb69ec6f71e77a73aa0869 causes this unintended behaviour. Fix that!

This is essentiallly just a small line change, should I just remove the Regex that specifically excludes force_label from being shown as a label?

as discussed this will likely not be that easy. Feel free to change a single line and execute a test in https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/4458/commits/5c9a138ceb6dbf5492bb69ec6f71e77a73aa0869#diff-e39dc601fe37b060cdfa75edfbafee3824d347e84cbbab2a928c7b6be6160520R94

I also suggested to add a test for the current behaviour first.

The job above shows a label as expected now, setting this to resolved.