Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #98087

closed

jobs on s390 fail with "Too few arguments for subroutine 'consoles::sshVirtsh::define_and_start'" after OSD deployment on 2021-09-03

Added by Xiaojing_liu about 3 years ago. Updated almost 3 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
High
Assignee:
Category:
Regressions/Crashes
Target version:
Start date:
2021-09-03
Due date:
2021-09-18
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
4.00 h

Description

Observation

jobs fail with

 # Test died: {
  "args" => [],
  "json_cmd_token" => "pPiZtnZT",
  "function" => "define_and_start",
  "cmd" => "backend_proxy_console_call",
  "wantarray" => undef,
  "console" => "svirt"
}
Too few arguments for subroutine 'consoles::sshVirtsh::define_and_start' at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/backend/baseclass.pm line 838.
 at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/backend/console_proxy.pm line 65.
    backend::console_proxy::__ANON__(undef) called at sle/tests/installation/bootloader_zkvm.pm line 78
    bootloader_zkvm::run(bootloader_zkvm=HASH(0x10011b8f888)) called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/basetest.pm line 355
    eval {...} called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/basetest.pm line 349
    basetest::runtest(bootloader_zkvm=HASH(0x10011b8f888)) called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/autotest.pm line 374
    eval {...} called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/autotest.pm line 374
    autotest::runalltests() called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/autotest.pm line 242
    eval {...} called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/autotest.pm line 242
    autotest::run_all() called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/autotest.pm line 298
    autotest::__ANON__(Mojo::IOLoop::ReadWriteProcess=HASH(0x1001269bf10)) called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/Mojo/IOLoop/ReadWriteProcess.pm line 326
    eval {...} called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/Mojo/IOLoop/ReadWriteProcess.pm line 326
    Mojo::IOLoop::ReadWriteProcess::_fork(Mojo::IOLoop::ReadWriteProcess=HASH(0x1001269bf10), CODE(0x100133df800)) called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.26.1/Mojo/IOLoop/ReadWriteProcess.pm line 477
    Mojo::IOLoop::ReadWriteProcess::start(Mojo::IOLoop::ReadWriteProcess=HASH(0x1001269bf10)) called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/autotest.pm line 300
    autotest::start_process() called at /usr/bin/isotovideo line 272

Here is an example: https://openqa.suse.de/tests/7011839#step/bootloader_zkvm/28

After rollbacking the deployment, the jobs didn't have this issue.


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Copied to openQA Project - action #98448: As followup to #98087 tell mergify to only accept changes with 100% patch statement coverageResolvedokurz2021-10-22

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by okurz about 3 years ago

  • Priority changed from Normal to Urgent
  • Target version set to Ready
Actions #3

Updated by livdywan about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Feedback

The PR was merged.

Actions #4

Updated by okurz about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to In Progress

PR merged. Triggered a new OSD deployment with https://gitlab.suse.de/openqa/osd-deployment/-/pipelines/198051

Actions #5

Updated by okurz about 3 years ago

deployment done, called script/openqa-label-all --verbose --openqa-host https://openqa.suse.de --label '* bootloader_zkvm: https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/98087' --module bootloader_zkvm

Actions #6

Updated by VANASTASIADIS about 3 years ago

  • Due date set to 2021-09-18

Setting due date based on mean cycle time of SUSE QE Tools

Actions #7

Updated by livdywan about 3 years ago

  • Assignee changed from okurz to Xiaojing_liu
Actions #8

Updated by livdywan about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Feedback

The follow-up PR got merged

Actions #9

Updated by Xiaojing_liu about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved

There are no reports in #testing and didn't find new fail jobs related to this issue, we consider this was fixed.

Actions #10

Updated by okurz about 3 years ago

  • Copied to action #98448: As followup to #98087 tell mergify to only accept changes with 100% patch statement coverage added
Actions #11

Updated by openqa_review about 3 years ago

This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:

This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: create_hdd_gnome_libyui@svirt-xen-hvm
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/7126583

To prevent further reminder comments one of the following options should be followed:

  1. The test scenario is fixed by applying the bug fix to the tested product or the test is adjusted
  2. The openQA job group is moved to "Released" or "EOL" (End-of-Life)
  3. The bugref in the openQA scenario is removed or replaced, e.g. label:wontfix:boo1234
Actions #12

Updated by Xiaojing_liu about 3 years ago

  • Estimated time set to 4.00 h
Actions #13

Updated by openqa_review almost 3 years ago

This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:

This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: create_hdd_gnome_libyui@svirt-xen-hvm
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/8162697

To prevent further reminder comments one of the following options should be followed:

  1. The test scenario is fixed by applying the bug fix to the tested product or the test is adjusted
  2. The openQA job group is moved to "Released" or "EOL" (End-of-Life)
  3. The bugref in the openQA scenario is removed or replaced, e.g. label:wontfix:boo1234
Actions #14

Updated by okurz almost 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
  • Priority changed from Urgent to High

Please check the soft-fail reference

Actions #15

Updated by tinita almost 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved

re https://openqa.suse.de/tests/8162697
The comment was:

syrianidou_sofia wrote 2022-02-14 21:24:56 +0000
poo#98087

(Automatic takeover from t#7014938)

I deleted it. The test failure had nothing to do with this issue.

(The linked takeover job was already gone)

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF