Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #88536

closed

openQA Project - coordination #102906: [saga][epic] Increased stability of tests with less "known failures", known incompletes handled automatically within openQA

openQA Project - coordination #88229: [epic] Prevent unintended test coverage decrease

Find out differences in openQA test coverage with metabase

Added by hurhaj about 3 years ago. Updated almost 3 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Target version:
Start date:
2021-02-12
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

User story

As a QE engineer, I would like to have a way of comparing openQA's tests (*.pm) utilization between our products, mostly before their release and after the release. With ~1500 tests available at this moment, it's very difficult to find out whether particular test is being used to it's full potential, if it is running on all products, code streams and architectures that it could and should run on. That brings a risk of needlessly lowering the testing coverage that is already available to us.

Acceptance criteria

  • AC1: Possibility to filter the data, to easily compare coverage between whichever products, code streams.

Tasks

Further details

As per previous discussions, Metabase seems to be the best way to realize this.


Files


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Related to QA - action #88127: [tools][qem] Test coverage DB for maintenance updatesClosedjbaier_cz2021-02-08

Actions
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF