Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

action #36730

closed

[sle][functional][y][medium] no route to the host 10.0.2.1 iscsi_client

Added by riafarov almost 6 years ago. Updated over 5 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
riafarov
Category:
Bugs in existing tests
Target version:
SUSE QA - Milestone 20
Start date:
2018-06-04
Due date:
2018-11-20
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
5.00 h
Difficulty:

Description

Observation

Seems that not all workers support required configuration. Need to investigate and potentially set WORKER_CLASS properly

openQA test in scenario sle-15-Installer-DVD-x86_64-iscsi_client@64bit fails in
iscsi_client

workaround

  • Retrigger, should work if another worker picks the job

Reproducible

Fails since (at least) Build 661.1 (current job)

Expected result

Last good: 658.1 (or more recent)

Further details

Always latest result in this scenario: latest

Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago

  • Subject changed from [sle][functional][y] no route to the host 10.0.2.1 iscsi_client to [sle][functional][y][fast] no route to the host 10.0.2.1 iscsi_client
  • Due date set to 2018-06-19
  • Priority changed from Normal to Urgent
  • Target version set to Milestone 17

happening in SLE15 GMC. Should be treated urgently.

Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago

  • Subject changed from [sle][functional][y][fast] no route to the host 10.0.2.1 iscsi_client to [sle][functional][y] no route to the host 10.0.2.1 iscsi_client
  • Status changed from New to Workable
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by mgriessmeier almost 6 years ago

  • Subject changed from [sle][functional][y] no route to the host 10.0.2.1 iscsi_client to [sle][functional][y][medium] no route to the host 10.0.2.1 iscsi_client
  • Description updated (diff)
  • Priority changed from Urgent to High

downrating to High, since we have a workaround by restarting the test

Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago

  • Assignee set to riafarov
Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago

https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/5197 merged. But this only improves and does not fix this ticket, right?

Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago

@okurz, as described in the ticket, we may start configuring client before server configuration is finished. In 2 failed runs when we close xterm, in the video we can see that iscsi server hasn't returned exit code yet. As for original hypothesis, I was not able to identify any differences in the workers configuration.

Actions
Copy link
 #7

Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Workable to Feedback
Actions
Copy link
 #8

Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago

  • Target version changed from Milestone 17 to Milestone 17
Actions
Copy link
 #9

Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago

Test runs triggered on osd: https://openqa.suse.de/tests/1765737# and previous

Actions
Copy link
 #10

Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago

  • Due date changed from 2018-06-19 to 2018-07-03

Wait for verification runs, then block by https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/31351

Actions
Copy link
 #11

Updated by JERiveraMoya almost 6 years ago

  • Estimated time set to 5.00 h
Actions
Copy link
 #12

Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago

  • Blocked by action #31351: [functional][u][medium] force_cron_run does not actually run any crons (occasionally) added
Actions
Copy link
 #13

Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Blocked

Issue can be reproduced only on SLE 15 and only on osd. Currently test always fails because of performance issues of the VM, required tab cannot be selected, so set to blocked and wait until it we resolve #31351 first.

Actions
Copy link
 #14

Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago

  • Due date changed from 2018-07-03 to 2018-07-31
Actions
Copy link
 #15

Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Blocked to Workable
Actions
Copy link
 #16

Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago

  • Due date changed from 2018-07-31 to 2018-08-14
  • Target version changed from Milestone 17 to Milestone 18

riafarov please document your current findings, it's not urgent to fix now. Let's wait for a 15SP1 build and see if it fails there as it currently does not seem to make problems on SLE12SP4

Actions
Copy link
 #17

Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago

  • Blocked by deleted (action #31351: [functional][u][medium] force_cron_run does not actually run any crons (occasionally))
Actions
Copy link
 #18

Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago

  • Assignee deleted (riafarov)

So test rarely fails with no route found to the host (~1 per 20 runs), usually tab is not displayed properly, which was addressed with explicit btrfs balancing calls. For SLE 12 SP4 test works stably and there are no issues at all.
There is no clear pattern with workers either, as job may fail or succeeds on the same instance of the same worker. I was not able to reproduce the issue locally in my setup neither, which got broken. So after all it can be related to firewalld, but there is no proof so far. Steps are pretty well synced and this was partly improved with PR mentioned above. Un-assign myself for now. SLE 15 SP1 build fail on registration ATM.

Actions
Copy link
 #19

Updated by riafarov almost 6 years ago

  • Due date deleted (2018-08-14)
  • Priority changed from High to Normal
  • Target version changed from Milestone 18 to Milestone 20

As discussed with okurz, revisiting for SLE 15

Actions
Copy link
 #20

Updated by okurz over 5 years ago

  • Due date set to 2018-11-20
Actions
Copy link
 #21

Updated by riafarov over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Workable to Rejected
  • Assignee set to riafarov

Issue not detected for SLE 15-SP1, but we have other issues, like mkfs.ext4 returning non-zero code, I will create ticket for that.

Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF