action #34090
closed[microos] New Kubic Installation Workflow - no check for small disks
0%
Description
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/646032#step/partitioning_finish/1 is showing the correct(for now) error message when the systems disks are too small
We need partitioning_finish to have the similar disk-too-small checking to the old scenario https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/642625#
Or we need to drop the scenario
I think it would be a good thing for SLE and openSUSE to have a generic test for checking installations on way too small of a disk, I don't think is a kubic specific feature, not entirely sure why testing was only implemented there.
CCing Martin as owner of the old tests
Updated by okurz about 6 years ago
This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:
This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: MicroOS-10G-disk
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/655894
Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago
- Subject changed from New Kubic Installation Workflow - no check for small disks to [microos] New Kubic Installation Workflow - no check for small disks
Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago
This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:
This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: MicroOS-10G-disk
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/674691
Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago
This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:
This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: MicroOS-10G-disk
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/683985
Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago
This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:
This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: MicroOS-10G-disk
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/691178
Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago
This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:
This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: MicroOS-10G-disk
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/698138
Updated by RBrownSUSE almost 6 years ago
- Status changed from New to Feedback
With the removal of the partitioner from the Kubic workflow, this issue is no longer relevant and has evolved into a product bug
Updated by okurz over 2 years ago
- Priority changed from Normal to Low
This ticket was set to "Normal" priority but was not updated within 730 days which is 2 times the period of the SLO for "Normal" tickets (365 days) as described on https://progress.opensuse.org/projects/openqatests/wiki/Wiki#SLOs-service-level-objectives . The ticket will be set to the next lower priority of "Low".
Updated by maritawerner over 2 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Rejected
Closing as this is now a product bug (see comment above).