action #30739
closed
[sle][functional][easy] test fails in first_boot - gnome session does not come up fully on ppc64le RAID installation -> workaround for bsc#1065150
Added by SLindoMansilla over 6 years ago.
Updated about 6 years ago.
Category:
Bugs in existing tests
Description
Observation¶
openQA test in scenario sle-15-Installer-DVD-ppc64le-RAID0@ppc64le fails in
first_boot
Acceptance criteria¶
- AC1: The test suites about raid on ppc does not fail on first boot because of bsc#1065150
- AC2: The bug bsc#1065150 is soft-failed.
Tasks¶
- Fix test module first_boot for test suites:
- raid 0
- raid 1
- raid 10
- raid 5
- raid 6
- lvm+raid
Reproducible¶
Fails since (at least) Build 346.1
Expected result¶
Last good: 343.1 (or more recent)
Further details¶
Always latest result in this scenario: latest
- Subject changed from [sle][functional] test fails in first_boot - gnome session does not come up fully on ppc64le RAID installation to bsc#1065150[sle][functional] test fails in first_boot - gnome session does not come up fully on ppc64le RAID installation -> workaround for bsc#1065150
- Due date set to 2018-02-13
- Target version set to Milestone 14
- Subject changed from bsc#1065150[sle][functional] test fails in first_boot - gnome session does not come up fully on ppc64le RAID installation -> workaround for bsc#1065150 to [sle][functional][easy] test fails in first_boot - gnome session does not come up fully on ppc64le RAID installation -> workaround for bsc#1065150
- Status changed from Workable to Blocked
- Due date changed from 2018-02-13 to 2018-02-27
- Due date changed from 2018-02-27 to 2018-03-13
- Status changed from Blocked to Workable
- Status changed from Workable to Rejected
we now use default module selection in all RAID tests, so we do not end up with gnome. Hence rejected.
- Status changed from Rejected to Resolved
hm, that's tricky. So first: Setting to "resolved" because we actually worked around the issue as expected :-) But thinking about it, shouldn't we have RAID tests that go to a GUI installation, especially when we have found bugs like bsc+1065150?
Also available in: Atom
PDF