QA (public) » openQA Project (public) » openQA Tests (public)

lvm-full-encrypt¶

ppc64 previous results:
lvm-full-encrypt@ppc64le

• got stucked only once during initialization of the installation ppc64le-Build414.13-lvm-full-encrypt@ppc64le, Assigned worker: malbec:4

s390x previous results:
lvm-full-encrypt@s390x-kvm-sle12

• no occurence of test error on system_role module

x86-64 previous results:
lvm-full-encrypt@64bit

• 1 test error Build393.1-lvm-full-encrypt@64bit, missing option for DESKTOP=gnome test case (SLES with GNOME)

Aarch64 previous results from build 503.1:
lvm-full-encrypt@aarch64

• no occurence of test error on system_role module

I have chosen as another reference create_hdd_gnome and create_hdd_textmode jobs.

create_hdd_gnome¶

ppc64 previous results:
create_hdd_gnome@ppc64le

• no occurence of test error on system_role module

s390x previous results:
create_hdd_gnome@s390x-kvm-sle12

• no occurence of test error on system_role module

x86-64 previous results:
create_hdd_gnome@64bit

• 1 test error Build393.1-create_hdd_gnome@64bit, missing option for DESKTOP=gnome test case (SLES with GNOME)

Aarch64 previous results:
create_hdd_gnome@aarch64

• 1 test error Build393.1-create_hdd_gnome@aarch64, missing option for DESKTOP=gnome test case (SLES with GNOME)

create_hdd_textmode¶

ppc64 previous results:
create_hdd_textmode@ppc64le

• no occurence of test error on system_role module

s390x previous results:
create_hdd_textmode@s390x-kvm-sle12

• no occurence of test error on system_role module

x86-64 previous results:
create_hdd_textmode@64bit

• Build429.1-create_hdd_textmode@64bit, yast2 font change issue
• Build303.1-create_hdd_textmode@64bit, unmatched needle

Aarch64 previous results from build 503.1:
create_hdd_textmode@aarch64

• Build299.1-create_hdd_textmode@aarch64, partition manager appeared instead of system role
• Build300.1-create_hdd_textmode@aarch64, partition manager appeared instead of system role
• Build303.1-create_hdd_textmode@aarch64, unmatched needle

ppc workers used with build 509.1:¶

QA-Power8-4-kvm:1
QA-Power8-4-kvm:2
QA-Power8-4-kvm:3
QA-Power8-4-kvm:4
QA-Power8-4-kvm:5
QA-Power8-4-kvm:6
QA-Power8-4-kvm:7
QA-Power8-4-kvm:8

QA-Power8-5-kvm:1
QA-Power8-5-kvm:2
QA-Power8-5-kvm:3
QA-Power8-5-kvm:4
QA-Power8-5-kvm:5
QA-Power8-5-kvm:6
QA-Power8-5-kvm:7
QA-Power8-5-kvm:8
powerqaworker-qam-1:1
powerqaworker-qam-1:2
powerqaworker-qam-1:3
powerqaworker-qam-1:4
powerqaworker-qam-1:5

Conclusion¶

IMHO it looks like more a worker issue than bug in a test or product.
Worker malbec:4 has not been used over a month and according to its history it had multiple incomplete and error job runs around the time when this job ran.
This type of error has not been observed on any other architecture.

Very good investigation and good conclusion. Yes, malbec produced quite some "worker specific" problems and I am fine with closing this ticket as "resolved" with the resolution being that malbec was disabled anyway and therefore we do not see a necessary action on the side of tests. I think the QA tools team is on the task to bring malbec back. I hope they do as good a job as they did when they brought in workers in before, that is having them run in a confined environment until they have proven themselves stable enough for production work :)