action #23452
coordination #23454: [sle][functional][epic][sle15] Adapt former SDK tests to something equivalent for SLE15
[sles][functional] Autoyast tests that fails because are trying to get an iso for SDK product (in SLE15 SDK is a module)
Status:
Rejected
Priority:
High
Assignee:
Category:
Bugs in existing tests
Target version:
Start date:
2017-08-18
Due date:
2017-12-22
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Difficulty:
History
#1
Updated by okurz almost 5 years ago
- Category set to Bugs in existing tests
- Assignee set to mgriessmeier
- Priority changed from Normal to Urgent
We need to check this job before it is cleaned up. mgriessmeier, can you take a look, please?
#2
Updated by mgriessmeier almost 5 years ago
- Status changed from New to Feedback
still the same:
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&test=autoyast_eula&distri=sle&flavor=Leanos-DVD&version=15&machine=64bit#previous
adding to the generic SLE-15-SDK ticket
#3
Updated by mgriessmeier almost 5 years ago
- Blocked by coordination #23454: [sle][functional][epic][sle15] Adapt former SDK tests to something equivalent for SLE15 added
#4
Updated by okurz almost 5 years ago
- Target version set to Milestone 12
#5
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
do we still see this problem or did we make sure that no autoyast job tries to add non-existant SDK for SLE15?
#6
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
- Priority changed from Urgent to High
- Parent task deleted (
#20580)
couldn't find this as label in recent jobs so urgent -> high. also, #23454 should be a better parent
#7
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
- Blocked by deleted (coordination #23454: [sle][functional][epic][sle15] Adapt former SDK tests to something equivalent for SLE15)
#8
Updated by okurz over 4 years ago
- Parent task set to #23454
#9
Updated by sebchlad over 4 years ago
- Due date set to 2017-12-22
#10
Updated by mgriessmeier over 4 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Rejected
[10:29] < riafarov> | mgriessmeier: and SDK doesn't make any sense there as dev tools module comes for free [10:30] < riafarov> | mgriessmeier: we have used WE and HA
I consider this as not necessary anymore