Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #18076

closed

[tools][openqa-monitoring] no products found, retrying version wildcard

Added by nicksinger over 7 years ago. Updated over 5 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Regressions/Crashes
Target version:
Start date:
2017-03-28
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

observation

[Tue Mar 28 07:09:40 2017] [31798:warn] no products found, retrying version wildcard
[Tue Mar 28 06:21:26 2017] [25543:warn] no products found, retrying version wildcard
[Tue Mar 28 05:50:48 2017] [14721:warn] no products found, retrying version wildcard
[Tue Mar 28 05:50:49 2017] [14721:warn] no products found, retrying version wildcard
[and many moreā€¦]

suggestion

Not sure about the true meaning of this warning but it's lack of information makes this warning almost useless anyway.
Since this is now a known issue, I'll provide a PR for the logwarn-script of okurz to ignore this warning.


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Copied to openQA Project (public) - action #19730: [tools][openqa-monitoring] "can't remove <needle_path>"Resolvedmkittler2017-03-28

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by okurz over 7 years ago

https://github.com/okurz/openqa_monitoring/pull/8 merged accepting known failure in monitoring

Actions #2

Updated by okurz over 7 years ago

  • Copied to action #19730: [tools][openqa-monitoring] "can't remove <needle_path>" added
Actions #3

Updated by coolo about 7 years ago

  • Target version set to Ready

this should be debug indeed - useless as warning

Actions #4

Updated by mkittler almost 6 years ago

Not sure about the true meaning of this warning

It means that an ISO has been posted via the REST API and for the given combination of version, distri, flavor and arch no products could be found. Hence the API tried to find products regardless of the specified version (taking only distri, flavor and arch into account). If that would also not yield any products a real failure would be logged.

@coolo Is this weird behavior of ignoring search parameters on mismatch really needed? I mean, why would one create such a strange API and not simply let the client retry the search?

I'd say this weird behavior should go away and errors of that API should be propagated to the other end and not logged on the server. That should be easy to implement. But how does the client look like? Would it display/log the error then?

Actions #5

Updated by coolo almost 6 years ago

that's not an API error - it's the true nature of the wildcard. If there wasn't this strange warning, no one would have complained

Actions #6

Updated by mkittler over 5 years ago

  • Assignee set to mkittler
  • Target version changed from Ready to Current Sprint

Ok, so let's just remove the warning from the openQA log where it is pretty useless without context and instead add it to the result of the scheduled product instead.

Actions #8

Updated by mkittler over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
Actions #9

Updated by mkittler over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved

PR which moves the warning (and similar warnings) to the scheduled products log has been merged.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF