Actions
action #166661
closedcoordination #127031: [saga][epic] openQA for SUSE customers
coordination #130414: [epic] Improved code coverage in os-autoinst
[beginner][os-autoinst][CI] Unhandled output in t/20-openqa-isotovideo-utils.t size:S
Start date:
2024-09-11
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Tags:
Description
Motivation¶
https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/actions/runs/10636102041/job/29487175257 as well as other CI job invocations of os-autoinst show the problem of unhandled output. We want to have a clean TAP output with all output from tested application code to be captured:
3: root is not in the sudoers file.
3: [16:38:45] t/20-openqa-isotovideo-utils.t ........... ok 1218 ms ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 1.05 cusr 0.17 csys = 1.23 CPU)
Acceptance criteria¶
- AC1: No unhandled output from t/20-openqa-isotovideo-utils.t
Suggestions¶
- Call
prove -I. t/20-openqa-isotovideo-utils.t
locally to reproduce - Check which part of the code triggers the output, e.g. by checking the output of
prove -v ...
- Surround calls with according output capture code as we already have in many other cases, likely even in the same test module.
Updated by okurz 2 months ago
- Copied to action #166664: [beginner][os-autoinst][CI] Unhandled output in t/23-baseclass.t size:S added
Updated by okurz about 1 month ago
- Target version changed from Tools - Next to Ready
Updated by okurz about 1 month ago
- Subject changed from [os-autoinst][CI] Unhandled output in t/20-openqa-isotovideo-utils.t to [os-autoinst][CI] Unhandled output in t/20-openqa-isotovideo-utils.t size:S
- Status changed from New to Workable
Updated by okurz about 1 month ago
- Subject changed from [os-autoinst][CI] Unhandled output in t/20-openqa-isotovideo-utils.t size:S to [beginner][os-autoinst][CI] Unhandled output in t/20-openqa-isotovideo-utils.t size:S
Actions