action #158404
closed[qe-core][jeos]test fails in prepare_firstboot
0%
Description
Can you help to check the hardware please?
Observation¶
openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP6-JeOS-for-RaspberryPi-aarch64-jeos-realhw-RPi@RPi3B fails in
prepare_firstboot
Test suite description¶
Run a test on real RPi hardware. To be used eg. with RPi4 machine.
Setup: https://confluence.suse.com/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=~dheidler&title=Hardware+Automation
Reproducible¶
Fails since (at least) Build 2.5
Expected result¶
Last good: (unknown) (or more recent)
Further details¶
Always latest result in this scenario: latest
Updated by dheidler 6 months ago
Making log output more clear: https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/19004
Updated by dheidler 6 months ago
- Status changed from New to Feedback
Running the test again doesn't raise the same issue: https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13924015
The empty serial log at the broken test (not even the bootloader messages show up) suggests that the SUT was not powered on.
The additions to the shelly script might make this visible in the future:
https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/19008
Updated by livdywan 6 months ago
- Status changed from Feedback to In Progress
dheidler wrote in #note-6:
Running the test again doesn't raise the same issue: https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13924015
The empty serial log at the broken test (not even the bootloader messages show up) suggests that the SUT was not powered on.
The additions to the shelly script might make this visible in the future:
https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/19008
Please remember we can't have an urgent ticket in feedback. You need to confirm that the priority should in fact be lower, or implement mitigations to allow that
Updated by openqa_review 6 months ago
- Due date set to 2024-04-17
Setting due date based on mean cycle time of SUSE QE Tools
Updated by livdywan 6 months ago ยท Edited
How about we confirm how reproducible this is? https://openqa.suse.de/tests/overview?build=poo%23158404 There's barely any jobs running and this is a 15min job so it should be fine to run those (openqa-clone-job --repeat 1
)
00 --within-instance https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13919749 _GROUP=0 BUILD=poo#1584
04
Updated by dheidler 6 months ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- Priority changed from Urgent to High
I wouldn't run that many jobs as it would wear down the sd cards.
But the working test at https://openqa.suse.de/tests/13924015 shows that is was just a tmp issue.
So I guess we can remove the urgency - especially as the PR making the power cycling more verbose is now merged.
As the PR is not really necessary, I guess we can resolve this one.