Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #125153

closed

[qe-core] test fails in btrfsmaintenance

Added by msmeissn about 1 year ago. Updated about 1 year ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Bugs in existing tests
Target version:
-
Start date:
2023-02-28
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Difficulty:

Description

Observation

openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP1-Server-DVD-Updates-x86_64-mau-filesystem@64bit fails in
btrfsmaintenance

Test suite description

Testsuite maintained at https://gitlab.suse.de/qa-maintenance/qam-openqa-yml. Run filesystem tests against aggregated test repo

Reproducible

Fails since (at least) Build nfs_qa_run

Expected result

Last good: nfs_qa_run (or more recent)

Further details

Always latest result in this scenario: latest

Actions #1

Updated by msmeissn about 1 year ago

Problem is that we now release the preset fix to 15-sp1 ltss, the testcase needs to handle it:

Test module: /var/lib/openqa/share/tests/sle/tests/console/btrfsmaintenance.pm

change this:
# Fixed in SP1:Update, but is out of general support
if (is_sle("<15-SP2")) {

to:
if (is_sle("<15-SP1")) {

Actions #2

Updated by maritawerner about 1 year ago

  • Subject changed from test fails in btrfsmaintenance to [qe-core] test fails in btrfsmaintenance
Actions #3

Updated by ph03nix about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Assignee set to ph03nix
Actions #5

Updated by ph03nix about 1 year ago

msmeissn wrote:

Problem is that we now release the preset fix to 15-sp1 ltss, the testcase needs to handle it:

Test module: /var/lib/openqa/share/tests/sle/tests/console/btrfsmaintenance.pm

change this:
# Fixed in SP1:Update, but is out of general support
if (is_sle("<15-SP2")) {

to:
if (is_sle("<15-SP1")) {

I have a fix which is ready to be deployed, but it still fails in the VRs: https://duck-norris.qe.suse.de/tests/12171#step/btrfsmaintenance/10

When is the update being released to the pipeline?

Actions #6

Updated by msmeissn about 1 year ago

we have the update currently held back, should we push it into the QA queue now?

Actions #7

Updated by ph03nix about 1 year ago

msmeissn wrote:

we have the update currently held back, should we push it into the QA queue now?

Yes you can, we will fix it then once it's there. Which update is it exactly?

Actions #8

Updated by msmeissn about 1 year ago

SUSE:Maintenance:27801

I asked Sergio to push it back into QA now.

Actions #9

Updated by slemke about 1 year ago

msmeissn wrote:

SUSE:Maintenance:27801

I asked Sergio to push it back into QA now.

Hello,
ItÅ› back to the testing queue as:
S:M:27801:291029

Actions #10

Updated by ph03nix about 1 year ago

Thanks. I will check tomorrow and then report back. The fix should be ready.

Actions #11

Updated by ph03nix about 1 year ago

Failing test runs in 15-SP1:

Test runs are only failing on 15-SP1.

Test failure:

Script:
systemctl is-enabled btrfsmaintenance-refresh.service || true

Regular expression:
(?^:enabled)

Output:
disabled

This is IMHO still wrong, the expected output here is static. Checking the incident and the proposed fix.

Actions #12

Updated by ph03nix about 1 year ago

Got it.

  • if btrfsmaintenance-refresh.path is enabled, then btrfsmaintenance-refresh.service must be disabled or static.
  • if btrfsmaintenance-refresh.path is disabled, then btrfsmaintenance-refresh.service must be enabled.

Will update the test code accordingly.

Actions #13

Updated by ph03nix about 1 year ago

  • % Done changed from 40 to 100
Actions #14

Updated by ph03nix about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
Actions #15

Updated by dzedro about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Feedback

There is still this failure in incidents.
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/10611915#step/btrfsmaintenance/10

Actions #16

Updated by msmeissn about 1 year ago

the zypper incident does not have the presets update in it, this should go away once we release the presets incident.

Actions #17

Updated by ph03nix about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved

dzedro wrote:

There is still this failure in incidents.
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/10611915#step/btrfsmaintenance/10

As Marcus said. I marked the test run as softfailed, since there are no other issues with it.

Actions #18

Updated by dzedro about 1 year ago

27801 is released and btrfsmaintenance test is passing.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF