action #120984
closedassert_script_sudo does not see result
0%
Description
Observation¶
According to the screen shots, pidgin is properly removed, zypper returns code 0
All seems fine, yet the test fails
openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-desktopapps-message-gnome@64bit fails in
clean_pidgin
Test suite description¶
Reproducible¶
Fails since (at least) Build 20221125
Expected result¶
Last good: 20221124 (or more recent)
Further details¶
Always latest result in this scenario: latest
Updated by dimstar over 1 year ago
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2907539#step/zbar/5
This seems to be the same error class: zypper succeeds, openqa die not see the success
Updated by dimstar over 1 year ago
Also this one:
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2907539#step/zbar/5
That somewhat hints at https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/pull/2191 being responsible for the failures
Updated by dimstar over 1 year ago
- Subject changed from test fails in clean_pidgin to assert_script_sudo does not see result
- Priority changed from Normal to Urgent
Updated by maritawerner over 1 year ago
- Subject changed from assert_script_sudo does not see result to [desktop] assert_script_sudo does not see result
@zcjia or @GraceWang could you please have a look?
Updated by GraceWang over 1 year ago
- Subject changed from [desktop] assert_script_sudo does not see result to assert_script_sudo does not see result
Based on above comments and discussion in eng-testing slack channel on Monday between Dominique and Oliver, this ticket doesn't belong to [Desktop]. So remove the [Desktop] from subject.
Updated by ybonatakis over 1 year ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
The problem is some confusing implementation and how the script_sudo and assert_script_sudo work with the marker. From the os-autoinst-distri-opensuse side the only problem is that the assert_script_sudo uses wrong argument[0]. However the fix requires the necessary bits on os-autoinst. PR in the way
[0] https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/16002
Updated by dimstar over 1 year ago
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2913455#step/multi_users_dm/27 fails also on assert_script_sudo, but there we don't have an invalid timeout parameter defined
Updated by ybonatakis over 1 year ago
dimstar wrote:
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2913455#step/multi_users_dm/27 fails also on assert_script_sudo, but there we don't have an invalid timeout parameter defined
I will check. give me some time to complete os-autoinst changes
Updated by ybonatakis over 1 year ago
https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/pull/2223/files submitted but i have problem with the tests for now
Updated by ybonatakis over 1 year ago
dimstar wrote:
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2913455#step/multi_users_dm/27 fails also on assert_script_sudo, but there we don't have an invalid timeout parameter defined
http://aquarius.suse.cz/tests/14360 seems ok with the changes on both sides
Updated by ybonatakis over 1 year ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
Updated by dimstar over 1 year ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
openQA confirmed in the product: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2917652
Updated by ybonatakis over 1 year ago
resolved based on https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2907770