action #120984
assert_script_sudo does not see result
0%
Description
Observation¶
According to the screen shots, pidgin is properly removed, zypper returns code 0
All seems fine, yet the test fails
openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-desktopapps-message-gnome@64bit fails in
clean_pidgin
Test suite description¶
Reproducible¶
Fails since (at least) Build 20221125
Expected result¶
Last good: 20221124 (or more recent)
Further details¶
Always latest result in this scenario: latest
History
#1
Updated by dimstar 2 months ago
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2907539#step/zbar/5
This seems to be the same error class: zypper succeeds, openqa die not see the success
#2
Updated by dimstar 2 months ago
Also this one:
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2907539#step/zbar/5
That somewhat hints at https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/pull/2191 being responsible for the failures
#4
Updated by maritawerner 2 months ago
- Subject changed from assert_script_sudo does not see result to [desktop] assert_script_sudo does not see result
zcjia or @GraceWang could you please have a look?
#5
Updated by GraceWang 2 months ago
- Subject changed from [desktop] assert_script_sudo does not see result to assert_script_sudo does not see result
Based on above comments and discussion in eng-testing slack channel on Monday between Dominique and Oliver, this ticket doesn't belong to [Desktop]. So remove the [Desktop] from subject.
#6
Updated by ybonatakis 2 months ago
- Assignee set to ybonatakis
#7
Updated by ybonatakis 2 months ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
The problem is some confusing implementation and how the script_sudo
and assert_script_sudo
work with the marker. From the os-autoinst-distri-opensuse side the only problem is that the assert_script_sudo
uses wrong argument[0]. However the fix requires the necessary bits on os-autoinst
. PR in the way
[0] https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/16002
#8
Updated by dimstar 2 months ago
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2913455#step/multi_users_dm/27 fails also on assert_script_sudo, but there we don't have an invalid timeout parameter defined
#9
Updated by ybonatakis 2 months ago
dimstar wrote:
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2913455#step/multi_users_dm/27 fails also on assert_script_sudo, but there we don't have an invalid timeout parameter defined
I will check. give me some time to complete os-autoinst changes
#10
Updated by ybonatakis 2 months ago
https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/pull/2223/files submitted but i have problem with the tests for now
#11
Updated by ybonatakis 2 months ago
dimstar wrote:
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2913455#step/multi_users_dm/27 fails also on assert_script_sudo, but there we don't have an invalid timeout parameter defined
http://aquarius.suse.cz/tests/14360 seems ok with the changes on both sides
#12
Updated by ybonatakis 2 months ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
#13
Updated by dimstar 2 months ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
openQA confirmed in the product: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2917652
#14
Updated by ybonatakis 2 months ago
resolved based on https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/2907770