action #97958
closed
Do we need some additional info for this ticket?
for instance,
containers_docker_on_15.2_gm
and containers_podman_on_15.2_gm
are scheduled only for ppc64le
. do we need to consider other archs too?
- is it in the scope other combs, like
containers_podman_on_15.3
for this group?
ybonatakis wrote:
Do we need some additional info for this ticket?
for instance,
containers_docker_on_15.2_gm
and containers_podman_on_15.2_gm
are scheduled only for ppc64le
. do we need to consider other archs too?
- is it in the scope other combs, like
containers_podman_on_15.3
for this group?
Yes, that is also weird... do you know who enabled that?
jlausuch wrote:
ybonatakis wrote:
Do we need some additional info for this ticket?
for instance,
containers_docker_on_15.2_gm
and containers_podman_on_15.2_gm
are scheduled only for ppc64le
. do we need to consider other archs too?
- is it in the scope other combs, like
containers_podman_on_15.3
for this group?
Yes, that is also weird... do you know who enabled that?
no idea
ybonatakis wrote:
jlausuch wrote:
ybonatakis wrote:
Do we need some additional info for this ticket?
for instance,
containers_docker_on_15.2_gm
and containers_podman_on_15.2_gm
are scheduled only for ppc64le
. do we need to consider other archs too?
- is it in the scope other combs, like
containers_podman_on_15.3
for this group?
Yes, that is also weird... do you know who enabled that?
no idea
Also i do know if some of them belong in this group. containers_docker_on_15.2_gm
sounds like a job for https://openqa.opensuse.org/group_overview/69?!
ybonatakis wrote:
ybonatakis wrote:
jlausuch wrote:
ybonatakis wrote:
Do we need some additional info for this ticket?
for instance,
containers_docker_on_15.2_gm
and containers_podman_on_15.2_gm
are scheduled only for ppc64le
. do we need to consider other archs too?
- is it in the scope other combs, like
containers_podman_on_15.3
for this group?
Yes, that is also weird... do you know who enabled that?
no idea
Also i do know if some of them belong in this group. containers_docker_on_15.2_gm
sounds like a job for https://openqa.opensuse.org/group_overview/69?!
yes... I will try to sort this out next week... there is some mess around, but it's been there some time and no one shouted.. so I dont see it urgent.
- Status changed from New to Workable
- Status changed from Workable to In Progress
- Assignee set to jlausuch
- Related to action #102272: [opensuse] [qa-c] test fails in host_configuration added
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
Also available in: Atom
PDF