Actions
action #9544
closedaction #10148: better notification and user feedback
Build Tagging
Start date:
2015-11-13
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Description
user stories¶
- As a QA SLE product manager I want to be able to review the results from older builds for documentation reasons like I am used to with testopia
- As an openQA instance administrator I want to keep complete results only for "important builds" available in the live instance of openQA to use only reasonable amount of disk space
acceptance criteria¶
- tagged builds have a special mark making them distinguishable from other builds (e.g. a star icon)
- tagged builds (along with all test results) are not deleted by tidy up scripts
tasks¶
tag icon on group overview on important build
- Given 'group_overview' page
- When user creates comment with
tag:<build_ref>:important
- Then on page 'group_overview' rendering icon is shown on
important
builds
mark build as non-important build
- Given a comment
tag:<build_ref>:important
exists on a job group comments - When user creates another comment with
tag:<build_ref>:-important
- Then on page 'group_overview' build
<build_ref>
is not shown asimportant
- Given a comment
no cleanup of important builds
- Given a comment
tag:<build_ref>:important
exists on a job group comments - When GRU cleanup task is run
- And job OR job_group OR asset linked to build which is marked as important by comment as above
- Then "important builds" are skipped from cleanup
- Given a comment
Optional¶
- save important flag in job groups table
- Given a logged user and on the group_overview page of any product
- When user creates comment with
tag:<build_ref>:important
- Then save flag
important
in database table job_groups
further explanation¶
We need to implement Build tagging so we can identify when product builds (and their test results) are important - betas, alphas, GMCs, etc
This needs to be shown on the Dashboard, as well as used by any tidy up scripts (we never want to delete any test results from tagged builds)
- Every job within a build should be considered important -> no need to distinguish last jobs and retries or similar
- No need to preserve the group overview as shown when the build was declared important -> no need to save information on "last jobs". Alternative approach to save this information: Save the rendered HTML page, e.g. could be saved as PDF/A and hashed
Actions