action #93724
closedopenqa-review: "Unassigned bugs" includes soft-fails to bugs with assignees
0%
Updated by okurz over 3 years ago
- Project changed from 115 to openQA Project (public)
- Category set to Feature requests
Updated by dheidler over 3 years ago
- Status changed from Workable to In Progress
- Assignee set to dheidler
Updated by openqa_review over 3 years ago
- Due date set to 2021-07-03
Setting due date based on mean cycle time of SUSE QE Tools
Updated by dheidler over 3 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
I was unable to reproduce the issue and will therefore wait for a response from okurz on how he is running openqa-review to generate the dashboard.
Updated by okurz over 3 years ago
Gave the answer already in chat, can copy here:
openqa-review is called with parameters from https://github.com/os-autoinst/openqa_review/blob/master/bin/openqa-review-daily-email#L12 , that is --host ${openqa_host} -n -r -T --query-issue-status --no-empty-sections --include-softfails --running-threshold=2 --exclude-job-groups ^(Released|Development|old)
Updated by dheidler over 3 years ago
Updated by okurz over 3 years ago
merged. New SR created: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/901745
Updated by tinita over 3 years ago
When I wanted to review Dominik's PR yesterday, I found a similar issue, but on the o3 page:
https://w3.nue.suse.com/~okurz/openqa_opensuse_org_status.html#unassigned_box
Under OpenSUSE Tumbleweed you can find:
Arch: x86_64 Status: Red
Existing Product bugs:
soft fails: upgrade_Leap_42.1_kde -> boo1007701
soft fails: extra_tests_on_xfce -> bsc981596
extra_tests_textmode_containers, jeos-containers@64bit_virtio -> gh#containers/podman#10685
And if you go to the bsc981596 link:
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981596
you will see that the bug is assigned.
I found out it has to do with the matching (bsc
vs. bsc#
).
Should I create another ticket for this?
Updated by dheidler over 3 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to In Progress
I will handle it here
Updated by okurz over 3 years ago
Actually if people fail to follow the convention don't clean up after them, raise it as an error within the generated report
Updated by dheidler over 3 years ago
The existing regex allows bugrefs without a hash:
bugref_regex = "(poo|boo|bsc|bgo)#?([0-9]+)"
And bugrefs eg. in needles can't have a hash.
The problem is that the openqa_review Issue class is dealing with them inconsistently.
Updated by okurz over 3 years ago
I wonder who introduced that inconsistency :D
Updated by dheidler over 3 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback