action #91770
openQA - coordination #99303: [saga][epic] Future improvements for SUSE Maintenance QA workflows with fully automated testing, approval and release
coordination #109647: [epic] Future improvements: Simpler investigation of openQA test failures
Optional job investigation information in "investigation" tab rather than comments
0%
Description
Motivation¶
https://confluence.suse.com/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=openqa&title=QAM+openQA+review+guide explains the current process for openQA test review within SUSE QAM. We have already learned that they rely on some special rules which have not been foreseen like this within openQA, e.g. they see the black certificate as "tests reviewed and failures can be ignored" rather than "every job has a comment but not necessarily more than that" which is why we can look for a way to put such information not in comments but the "investigation" openQA job details.
Acceptance criteria¶
- AC1: openqa-investigate output is visible in the job investigation information, not in comments
Suggestions¶
- Instead of posting a comment over the API we could try to upload a JSON file to the job logs and if such file follows a convention in the file name we could parse such JSON file and display that as part of the investigation tab.