action #55553
closed
Not so helpful messages in logs about "Stopping worker 28181 gracefully (800 seconds)", "Worker XXX started"
Added by okurz over 4 years ago.
Updated over 4 years ago.
Category:
Feature requests
Description
This seems to have recently changed. The notion of "worker" is not very clear. Is this about minion workers? The message is probably happening a bit too often for "info" level and also missing details what the consequence or context is.
- Assignee changed from okurz to kraih
This message is coming from Mojolicious in file Mojo/server/Prefork
This was changed in a commit of Mojolicious in particular:
commit c85b18916
Author: Sebastian Riedel <sri@cpan.org>
Date: Tue Jul 4 12:08:23 2017 +0200
server log messages are not just for debugging
@kraih do you have a suggestion regarding this? Should we change it upstream again, handle it differently downstream?
July 2017 is not "recently". :) I don't see anything wrong with those log messages. Worker is general web server terminology, this is the Mojolicious prefork server.
yes, but we are talking within the openQA context. To me it seems this changed "recently" which can happen when we just updated the perl-Mojolicious package on the mentioned instance recently. Also in the context of openQA there is a "worker" which is not the same as the web server worker hence my questions for suggestions.
This is a complete non-issue imo., there are already more components used by openQA that are called a "worker", Apache workers, Minion workers, Mojo prefork workers, and probably more i can't think of atm. (Postgres has workers we might use in the future)... And the only component we are in a position to actually rename would be our own openQA workers.
- Status changed from New to Rejected
fine, let's leave it then
Also available in: Atom
PDF