action #47444
open[opensuse] test fails in select_patterns_and_packages ppc64le nothing provide libgdbm.so.5 (iso not coherent)
0%
Description
test fails in select_patterns_and_packages ppc64le
"nothing provide libgdbm.so.5 needed by libgdbm_compat4-1.14.1-1.1"
reported in multiple tests on 20190211 snapshot:
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/851991#step/select_patterns_and_packages/8 raid0
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/851831#step/select_patterns_and_packages/8 gpt
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/851830#step/select_patterns_and_packages/8 install_minimalx multipath
https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/851826#step/select_patterns_and_packages/8 minimalx
I checked the content of iso to verify that missing rpms in iso:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 normand ibm 58 févr 12 17:22 latest -> openSUSE-Tumbleweed-DVD-ppc64le-Snapshot20190211-Media.iso
[normand@sf1:/srv/ftp/pub/linux/opensuse/factory/ppc64le/iso]
$find ../os/ -name '*gdbm*'
../os/noarch/gdbm-lang-1.14.1-1.1.noarch.rpm
../os/ppc64le/gdbm-devel-1.14.1-1.1.ppc64le.rpm
../os/ppc64le/libgdbm6-1.18.1-1.1.ppc64le.rpm <= should be same version as other gdbm rpms
../os/ppc64le/libgdbm_compat4-1.14.1-1.1.ppc64le.rpm
So I assume there is a problem in OBS tools between build of packages and build of iso file.
Observation¶
openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-ppc64le-minimalx@ppc64le fails in
select_patterns_and_packages
Test suite description¶
MAX_JOB_TIME for bypass poo#44408
Reproducible¶
Fails since (at least) Build 20190211 (current job)
Expected result¶
Last good: 20190202 (or more recent)
Further details¶
Always latest result in this scenario: latest
Updated by okurz about 6 years ago
- Subject changed from test fails in select_patterns_and_packages ppc64le nothing provide libgdbm.so.5 (iso not coherent) to [opensuse] test fails in select_patterns_and_packages ppc64le nothing provide libgdbm.so.5 (iso not coherent)
So I assume there is a problem in OBS tools between build of packages and build of iso file.
Yes, I assume the same. So why have the ticket here?
Updated by okurz over 3 years ago
- Priority changed from Normal to Low
This ticket was set to "Normal" priority but was not updated within 730 days which is 2 times the period of the SLO for "Normal" tickets (365 days) as described on https://progress.opensuse.org/projects/openqatests/wiki/Wiki#SLOs-service-level-objectives . The ticket will be set to the next lower priority of "Low".