Do we want to update http://tumblesle.qa.suse.de/ or decommision it?
#6 Updated by okurz almost 2 years ago
I am not sure what your definition of "production ready" is in this context. I had the opportunity to talk to some people and "TumbleSLE" is still something which quite some people like to see including PM, e.g. I talked to jwerner about it, rbrown, lkocman, behlert, etc. I would say the job of tumblesle.qa.suse.de could be to show that it is technically feasible for us to provide a usable system of SLE while it is still in development as well as help motivate dev+QA to keep the quality level high. The effort on the side of tooling to show the results is minimal, the effort on the side of Dev to keep a certain level of quality guaranteed during the development phase is a follow-up to that and probably more effort but probably also something that we in QA would really like. I can just offer the idea of TumbleSLE to motivate people and provide a longer-term vision. How much you within the QSF-u and QSF-y teams want to focus on short-term or long-term goals I will leave to you of course.
#9 Updated by mgriessmeier about 1 year ago
- Subject changed from [functional][y][u] Do we want to update http://tumblesle.qa.suse.de/ or decommision it? to Do we want to update http://tumblesle.qa.suse.de/ or decommision it?
- Status changed from Rejected to In Progress
- Assignee set to okurz
so the question was "Do we (as in u- or y-team) want to decomission it?"
the answer to that question is "yes".
We (as u- or y-team) don't feel responsible for that project, but we are also not the maintainers of this project, so we cannot give the final decision on that, nor decomission it ourselves.
I will remove team tags and assign to maintainer
could be nice idea for sle16 though ;)
#10 Updated by okurz about 1 year ago
- Subject changed from Do we want to update http://tumblesle.qa.suse.de/ or decommision it? to [tools] Do we want to update http://tumblesle.qa.suse.de/ or decommision it?
- Status changed from In Progress to Workable
- Assignee deleted (
- Priority changed from Normal to Low
yes, this makes sense. I consider this still a valid idea but I have to see how this fits into other concepts, e.g. ttm could be an alternative. As the webpage on http://tumblesle.qa.suse.de/ is still up and giving a good overview I would like to keep it running as is. Would be nice to add support for more recent SLE versions and also ensure the machine is maintained as other machines, e.g. using salt and such but not critical or top priority. Hence updating to include "[tools]", set to "Workable" but "Low" in "future".