action #26984
closed[sle][functional][y] New test scenario: minimal+proxy_SCC-postreg_yast_scc
0%
Description
Acceptance criteria¶
- AC1: Have a test scenario for SLE12 to test registration and modules addition using yast_scc against proxy-SCC on ncurses and x11.
- AC2: Have a test scenario for SLE15 to test modules addition using yast_scc against proxy-SCC on ncurses and x11.
Tasks¶
- Adapt SLE12 ncurses tests to register and add modules using yast2_scc using two modules.
- minimal+base+sdk+proxy_SCC-postreg@64-bit (test suite is broken, wrong module schedule -> copland#1613
- minimal+base+sdk+proxy_SCC-postreg@uefi (test suite is broken, wrong module schedule -> copland#1614
- minimal+base+sdk+proxy_SCC-postreg@zkvm-image (test suite assumed as broken, wrong module schedule)
- sles+sdk+proxy_SCC_via_YaST@64bit
- Take SLE 12 SP4 in mind
- Reuse modules from SLE12 for SLE15, skipping registration module for yast2_scc, since SLE15 is already registered when using yast2_scc.
- Create a new test suite textmode+proxy_SCC-yast2_scc for SLE15
Further details¶
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Related to action #19566: [sle][functional]New test scenario: minimal+proxy_SCC-postreg_suseconnect_scc added
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
so let's not schedule that one for the next sprint, not yet workable
Updated by SLindoMansilla over 6 years ago
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Due date set to 2017-11-08
- Status changed from New to In Progress
you stated "should be already done" so with this confidence let's add it.
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Related to action #27028: [sle][functional]test fails in addon_products_via_SCC_yast2 - test does not expect that the system is already registered added
Updated by okurz over 6 years ago
- Category set to New test
the test module "addon_products_via_SCC_yast2" looks very similar, please take a look in #27028 and crosscheck
Updated by SLindoMansilla over 6 years ago
- Subject changed from [sle][functional]New test scenario: minimal+proxy_SCC-postreg_yast_scc to [sle][functional] New test scenario: minimal+proxy_SCC-postreg_yast_scc
- Description updated (diff)
Changes on acceptance criteria and tasks because of poo#27028
Actually the scope of this ticket is also affected by legacy tests from SLE12.
Updated by SLindoMansilla over 6 years ago
- Related to deleted (action #27028: [sle][functional]test fails in addon_products_via_SCC_yast2 - test does not expect that the system is already registered)
Updated by SLindoMansilla over 6 years ago
- Has duplicate action #27028: [sle][functional]test fails in addon_products_via_SCC_yast2 - test does not expect that the system is already registered added
Updated by SLindoMansilla over 6 years ago
- Blocked by action #27064: [functional][x86_64][s390x][uefi][y][yast][easy] Test suite minimal+base+sdk+proxy_SCC-postreg had a wrong scheduled module list with current version of os-autoinst-distri-opensuse added
Updated by SLindoMansilla over 6 years ago
- Assignee deleted (
SLindoMansilla)
Unassigned because it is not in this sprint nor in the next one, to clean my "assigned ticket" list.
Updated by riafarov over 6 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Workable
Updated by okurz about 6 years ago
- Blocked by action #30706: [sle][functional[sle12 sp4] test fails in boot_to_desktop - needle 'grub2' not found added
Updated by okurz about 6 years ago
- Blocked by deleted (action #30706: [sle][functional[sle12 sp4] test fails in boot_to_desktop - needle 'grub2' not found )
Updated by okurz about 6 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
- Due date set to 2018-04-10
- Status changed from Workable to Blocked
- Target version changed from Milestone 12 to Milestone 15
see blocking ticket
Updated by okurz about 6 years ago
This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script:
This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: sles+sdk+proxy_SCC_via_YaST
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/1461431
Updated by okurz about 6 years ago
- Assignee set to okurz
- Target version changed from Milestone 15 to Milestone 17
blocked by ticket in M17
Updated by okurz about 6 years ago
- Subject changed from [sle][functional] New test scenario: minimal+proxy_SCC-postreg_yast_scc to [sle][functional][y] New test scenario: minimal+proxy_SCC-postreg_yast_scc
- Description updated (diff)
- Due date changed from 2018-04-10 to 2018-05-22
- Status changed from Blocked to Workable
- Assignee deleted (
okurz) - Target version changed from Milestone 17 to Milestone 16
Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago
- Due date deleted (
2018-05-22) - Target version changed from Milestone 16 to Milestone 19
Does not have an effect on SLE15 anymore, we can postpone this in favor of other tasks now
Updated by okurz almost 6 years ago
- Target version changed from Milestone 19 to Milestone 19
Updated by okurz over 5 years ago
- Due date deleted (
2018-11-06) - Target version changed from Milestone 19 to future
Updated by riafarov about 5 years ago
- Status changed from Workable to Rejected
- Assignee set to riafarov
By now we have scenarios covering AC, except that it's not running for ncurses and x11, whereas, knowing how libyui is designed, risks are low that something will break in qt and not in ncurses or vice versa. And if there is such an issue we will notice it for installations handled in qt vs ncurses + other test scenarios where we run tests against both versions (e.g. yast2_lan and yast2_i, which are executed for X11 and ncurses)