Actions
action #166673
closedcoordination #127031: [saga][epic] openQA for SUSE customers
coordination #130414: [epic] Improved code coverage in os-autoinst
[beginner][os-autoinst][CI] Unhandled output in t/29-backend-ipmi.t size:S
Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
Category:
Regressions/Crashes
Target version:
Start date:
2024-09-11
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Tags:
Description
Motivation¶
https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/actions/runs/10636102041/job/29487175257 as well as other CI job invocations of os-autoinst show the problem of unhandled output. We want to have a clean TAP output with all output from tested application code to be captured:
3: [2024-08-30T16:39:15.671530Z] [debug] [pid:2490] Xterm PID: 2494
3: [2024-08-30T16:39:15.686585Z] [debug] [pid:2490] IPMI: simulating ipmi sol deactivate
3: [2024-08-30T16:39:15.688446Z] [debug] [pid:2490] Xterm PID: 2496
3: [2024-08-30T16:39:15.689039Z] [warn] [pid:2490] !!! consoles::sshXtermIPMI::current_screen: IPMI SOL connection died, reconnect 1 / 1
3: [2024-08-30T16:39:15.695106Z] [debug] [pid:2490] IPMI: simulating ipmi sol deactivate
3: [2024-08-30T16:39:15.696885Z] [debug] [pid:2490] Xterm PID: 2498
Acceptance criteria¶
- AC1: No unhandled output from t/29-backend-ipmi.t
Suggestions¶
- Call
prove -I. t/29-backend-ipmi.t
locally to reproduce - Check which part of the code triggers the output, e.g. by checking the output of
prove -v ...
- Surround calls with according output capture code as we already have in many other cases, likely even in the same test module.
Updated by okurz 3 months ago
- Copied from action #166670: [beginner][os-autoinst][CI] Unhandled output in t/27-consoles-local_xvnc.t size:S added
Updated by robert.richardson about 1 month ago
- Status changed from Workable to In Progress
- Assignee set to robert.richardson
Updated by robert.richardson about 1 month ago
Actions