QA (public) » openQA Project (public) » openQA Tests (public)

Testcase for this feature:
http://crocodile.qa.suse.cz/tests/3105

PR in question: https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/pull/1386

only enable the tests for SLES then for now.

Something doesn't work in this snapper cleanup algorithm.
Could be that the HDD of 20Gb is too small. I will try with 30 and update the task.

dgutu wrote:

Something doesn't work in this snapper cleanup algorithm.
Could be that the HDD of 20Gb is too small. I will try with 30 and update the task.

http://crocodile.qa.suse.cz/tests/3775#step/snapper_cleanup/71

dgutu I think you might be wanting too much in one step :-) Better just add the test for one single scenario than not have it ready at all.

Feature test: PASSED

Used dgutu's PR, adapted it a bit and ran in
http://lord.arch/tests/2682

but it takes rather long to execute so I am convinced it must not be called as part of every console test.

I tried to execute it as part of "extra tests" but it turns the filesystem R/O, probably because space got depleted? See http://lord.arch/tests/2687#step/snapper_cleanup/29
Even worse, it doesn't fail the test.

But nevertheless, here are my suggestions: https://github.com/dgutu-suse/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/compare/features/snapper_cleanup...okurz:feature/snapper_cleanup?expand=1

Bug was created - https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998360

Test was added to o.s.d, for now it will part of sles+extratests.

I need your opinion on the following:

• The bug created based on behavior of snapper_cleanup test could be invalid IF the root partition where test is running is not less then 20GB.
• Every run where I have used HDDSIZEGB=22 and TOGGLEHOME=1 passed.

Should I consider an update on testcase 'sles+extratests' by using HDDSIZEGB=22 and
TOGGLEHOME=1 (the default layout will create a separate /home and / if the last will be used)?
Thx.

..

Dumitru, could you please check with Martin Kravec about qgroups? Maybe he can check here.

maritawerner wrote:

Dumitru, could you please check with Martin Kravec about qgroups? Maybe he can check here.

We already had a discussion with Martin, our tasks are different.
for x86_64 snapper cleanup is passing but it behaves different for ppc for unknown reason for now, I will investigate.

Thank you, great

I guess you set it to "in progress" because of the differing behaviour on ppc64le, right? can you shortly mention the corresponding bug?

Because on ppc architecture the block size is much bigger than on x86 architecture I've decided to create separate testcase for ppc.
So, I've added 2 testcase, one for creating the hdd image with bigger size and second is the test which is sles+extratests for ppc.
I will add the link with the working test later.