Project

General

Profile

Actions

action #108004

closed

Consider jobs important so long as they reference open bugs

Added by livdywan over 2 years ago. Updated over 2 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Support
Target version:
Start date:
2022-03-08
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Motivation

From #105657:

  • The number of retries seen in a job is pretty handy
  • Log files tend to be gone after 3 days or so, which might be fine because bugs should be handled by then. Although uploading log files to bugs is recommended since otherwise the issue can't be investigated
  • Idea, maybe jobs with open bugs should generally be archived?

openQA has the concept of important jobs and #108001 is about using them to keep around job results longer.

I'm thinking it would be a lot easier if openQA could rely on the comments that are added naturally as part of the review process. Less to know about, more time spent with the actual review than losing results.


Related issues 1 (1 open0 closed)

Copied from openQA Project - action #108001: [doc][ux][ui] Make it more obvious what "important jobs" are and how one can make jobs important (was: Important tags don't seem to have any effect)New

Actions
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF