action #10478
closedaarch64
Added by RBrownSUSE about 8 years ago. Updated almost 8 years ago.
70%
Updated by okurz about 8 years ago
- Assignee set to RBrownSUSE
aarch appears now in SLES but incomplete: https://openqa.suse.de/tests/200101
Updated by RBrownSUSE about 8 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
aarch64 in test development
waiting for Interlock/PRD and more builds to help get a picture of a required/realistic scope and will adjust testing accordingly
Updated by RBrownSUSE about 8 years ago
- Checklist item changed from to [ ] sle
- Target version set to Milestone 2
Some tests are in Test Development
aarch64 needs to be tested as close to fully as possible given available hardware
This task exists now to track any problems that arise - the Assignee is responsible for adding aarch64 jobs to the SLE 12 SP2 Server Job group and making sure they work
Updated by okurz about 8 years ago
current status is that keyboard seems to not work. next step: check manually in a qemu if keyboard works
Updated by RBrownSUSE about 8 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Closed
Updated by RBrownSUSE about 8 years ago
- Status changed from Closed to In Progress
- % Done changed from 0 to 70
Updated by okurz almost 8 years ago
can you update on what is missing? It seems like there is bug https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978157 and such but as these are definetly product bugs from the side of "aarch64 support in openQA" we are done, are we not?
Updated by okurz almost 8 years ago
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/384742/modules/yast2_bootloader/steps/5 seems to show a correct bootloader configuration screen for "GRUB2 for EFI" on aarch64 w/o secure boot support. My guess would be: new needle needed but I am not sure
vim tries to start but takes long (or too long)
same as for sshd
Updated by okurz almost 8 years ago
… but aarch64 reaches gnome, fcrozat is happy :-)
bug for "missing desktop icons": https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979444
Updated by RBrownSUSE almost 8 years ago
the narrow box makes me feel it's wrong and misformatted..
I'd expect it to look more like https://openqa.suse.de/tests/384409/modules/yast2_bootloader/steps/3 just without the secure boot options
Updated by okurz almost 8 years ago
needle created for yast2_bootloader as discussed on irc://chat.freenode.net/yast
Updated by okurz almost 8 years ago
- Checklist item changed from [ ] sle to [x] sle
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
Considered done, e.g. see https://openqa.suse.de/tests/443162 for a successful allpatterns test with soft failures for known product issues.
Updated by okurz almost 8 years ago
- Has duplicate action #9776: ARM Tests added