action #71734
Updated by szarate over 3 years ago
## Observation This test is redundant, as the "hardware" variation doesn't really deserve the time invested in the review (as it is prone to failures) The tests running in the gnome_sled scenario are mostly distributed across other test suites, however the main candidate to replace it, would be we-module, so we're dropping gnome_sled in favor of we-module in this case, and increasing the ram there, as we know already that systems running gnome under 2G will end up in a unstable system (see https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166955) openQA test in scenario sle-15-SP3-Online-x86_64-gnome_sled@laptop_64bit-virtio-vga fails in [system_prepare](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/4717943/modules/system_prepare/steps/2) ## Acceptance criteria ~~- **AC1:** All post installation test modules from `gnome_sled` are scheduled on other non-sled scenario - It is accepted if they are scheduled in another job group for SLE15-SP3~~ ~~- **AC2:** SLED installation is covered in a job group. - If Yast team or Desktop team (is there any other team related?) don't cover it, it is a no-go to remove this test suite. ~~ ** AC1:** `gnome_sled` is unscheduled ** AC1:** `we-module` is running with 2GB of ram (use `MACHINE=64bit-2gbram`) ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [42.1](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/4712404) ## Expected result Last good: [36.5](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/4703230) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.suse.de/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=sle&flavor=Online&machine=laptop_64bit-virtio-vga&test=gnome_sled&version=15-SP3)