action #98727
closed[tools][sle][aarch64] the published hdd can't be booted up due to wrong format
Description
Observation¶
From the test, we can see the hdd can't be booted.
https://openqa.nue.suse.com/tests/7108821
[2021-09-14T14:19:03.826 CEST] [warn] !!! : qemu-system-aarch64: -blockdev driver=qcow2,node-name=hd0-overlay0,file=hd0-overlay0-file,cache.no-flush=on: Could not open backing file: Image is not in qcow2 format
Steps to reproduce¶
1) Publish hdd with below case
http://openqa.nue.suse.com/tests/7103389
2) Run the cases with the published hdd
3) We can hit the issue mentioned above
Problem¶
I am wondering some performance problem with the backend worker
In this case, the test passed without any issue. but the qcow2 image seems not bootable
qemu-img info sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64_sb.qcow2
image: sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64_sb.qcow2
file format: raw
virtual size: 2.43 GiB (2607030272 bytes)
disk size: 2.43 GiB
Suggestion¶
Add some code checking for image's format
Workaround¶
a. re-trigger the job
b. switch to other worker with better performance
We used to publish a qcow2 hdd image during our tests, and this image can be used for later tests,however the hdd can't be booted up due to wrong format
Can someone help take a look at this issue?
Updated by rfan1 over 3 years ago
rfan1 wrote:
The issue can be rarely seen on other platforms [Re-run the tests can fix the issue], but we can see it on aarch64 platform many times, not sure if any performance issue with arm worker.
We used to publish a qcow2 hdd image during our tests, and this image can be used for later tests,however the hdd can't be booted up due to wrong format
For example:
http://openqa.nue.suse.com/tests/7103389#downloadsIn this case, the test passed without any issue. but the qcow2 image seems not bootable
qemu-img info sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64_sb.qcow2
image: sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64_sb.qcow2
file format: raw
virtual size: 2.43 GiB (2607030272 bytes)
disk size: 2.43 GiBCan someone help take a look at this issue?
BTW, this issue was fixed later [we switched to another arm worker and the issue was gone finally]
Updated by okurz over 3 years ago
- Subject changed from [sle][aarch64] the published hdd can't be booted up due to wrong format to [tools][sle][aarch64] the published hdd can't be booted up due to wrong format
- Category set to Infrastructure
- Status changed from New to Feedback
- Assignee set to okurz
- Target version set to Ready
rfan1 wrote:
BTW, this issue was fixed later [we switched to another arm worker and the issue was gone finally]
sounds like a workaround.
Could you please adapt the ticket description according to https://progress.opensuse.org/projects/openqav3/wiki/#Defects so that we have the necessary information to proceed? I suggest to crosscheck the checksum of assets before and after to see if something goes wrong on generation, transfer or use.
Updated by mkittler over 3 years ago
I assume the *.qcow2
file is actually supposed to be qcow2? I'm just asking because we recently introduced a change which would require that the extension is matching the format.
But otherwise it looks like the image has been somehow corrupted. We also got a warning in a related section of the autoinst log:
[2021-09-14T12:59:21.776 CEST] [debug] running nice ionice qemu-img convert -O qcow2 /var/lib/openqa/pool/15/raid/hd0-overlay1 assets_public/sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64_sb.qcow2
[2021-09-14T12:59:40.816 CEST] [debug] running qemu-img info --output=json assets_public/sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64_sb.qcow2
Use of uninitialized value in subtraction (-) at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/backend/qemu.pm line 514.
backend::qemu::do_extract_assets(backend::qemu=HASH(0xaaaaf6581570), HASH(0xaaaaf502b528)) called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/backend/driver.pm line 97
backend::driver::extract_assets(backend::driver=HASH(0xaaaaefe41358), HASH(0xaaaaf502b528)) called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/OpenQA/Isotovideo/Utils.pm line 178
eval {...} called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/OpenQA/Isotovideo/Utils.pm line 178
OpenQA::Isotovideo::Utils::handle_generated_assets(OpenQA::Isotovideo::CommandHandler=HASH(0xaaaaf6d80420), 1) called at /usr/bin/isotovideo line 420
[2021-09-14T12:59:40.880 CEST] [info] ::: backend::qemu::do_extract_assets: Extracting (?^u:^pflash-vars$)
[2021-09-14T12:59:40.881 CEST] [debug] running nice ionice qemu-img convert -O qcow2 /var/lib/openqa/pool/15/raid/pflash-vars-overlay1 assets_public/sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64-uefi-vars_sb.qcow2
[2021-09-14T12:59:41.307 CEST] [debug] running qemu-img info --output=json assets_public/sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64-uefi-vars_sb.qcow2
[2021-09-14T12:59:41.370 CEST] [debug] stopping backend process 79668
[2021-09-14T12:59:41.371 CEST] [debug] done with backend process
79273: EXIT 0
By the way, has this been happening more often or is this the first occurrence?
Updated by rfan1 over 3 years ago
mkittler wrote:
I assume the
*.qcow2
file is actually supposed to be qcow2? I'm just asking because we recently introduced a change which would require that the extension is matching the format.But otherwise it looks like the image has been somehow corrupted. We also got a warning in a related section of the autoinst log:
[2021-09-14T12:59:21.776 CEST] [debug] running nice ionice qemu-img convert -O qcow2 /var/lib/openqa/pool/15/raid/hd0-overlay1 assets_public/sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64_sb.qcow2 [2021-09-14T12:59:40.816 CEST] [debug] running qemu-img info --output=json assets_public/sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64_sb.qcow2 Use of uninitialized value in subtraction (-) at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/backend/qemu.pm line 514. backend::qemu::do_extract_assets(backend::qemu=HASH(0xaaaaf6581570), HASH(0xaaaaf502b528)) called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/backend/driver.pm line 97 backend::driver::extract_assets(backend::driver=HASH(0xaaaaefe41358), HASH(0xaaaaf502b528)) called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/OpenQA/Isotovideo/Utils.pm line 178 eval {...} called at /usr/lib/os-autoinst/OpenQA/Isotovideo/Utils.pm line 178 OpenQA::Isotovideo::Utils::handle_generated_assets(OpenQA::Isotovideo::CommandHandler=HASH(0xaaaaf6d80420), 1) called at /usr/bin/isotovideo line 420 [2021-09-14T12:59:40.880 CEST] [info] ::: backend::qemu::do_extract_assets: Extracting (?^u:^pflash-vars$) [2021-09-14T12:59:40.881 CEST] [debug] running nice ionice qemu-img convert -O qcow2 /var/lib/openqa/pool/15/raid/pflash-vars-overlay1 assets_public/sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64-uefi-vars_sb.qcow2 [2021-09-14T12:59:41.307 CEST] [debug] running qemu-img info --output=json assets_public/sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64-uefi-vars_sb.qcow2 [2021-09-14T12:59:41.370 CEST] [debug] stopping backend process 79668 [2021-09-14T12:59:41.371 CEST] [debug] done with backend process 79273: EXIT 0
By the way, has this been happening more often or is this the first occurrence?
Thanks all for the kindly help on this case! the we have met this issue many times before, especially when we run a openqa job with our own branch (very strange result, any restriction with our own branches?)
But, we used to re-run the job and then the issue is fix on x86_platform, but on arm platforms, we hit 5+ times even we tried to re-run the tests again and again, finally, we tried to switch to another worker and issue was gone.
Updated by rfan1 over 3 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
rfan1 wrote:
The issue can be rarely seen on other platforms [Re-run the tests can fix the issue], but we can see it on aarch64 platform many times, not sure if any performance issue with arm worker.
We used to publish a qcow2 hdd image during our tests, and this image can be used for later tests,however the hdd can't be booted up due to wrong format
For example:
http://openqa.nue.suse.com/tests/7103389#downloadsIn this case, the test passed without any issue. but the qcow2 image seems not bootable
qemu-img info sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64_sb.qcow2
image: sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64_sb.qcow2
file format: raw
virtual size: 2.43 GiB (2607030272 bytes)
disk size: 2.43 GiBCan someone help take a look at this issue?
Updated by okurz about 3 years ago
hm, I suspect that our workers openqaworker-arm-[123] can be even trusted less than we think.
note to team: I suggest to crosscheck the checksum of assets before and after to see if something goes wrong on generation, transfer or use.
@rfan I think you could help by updating the ticket with a regex matching the error condition to use https://github.com/os-autoinst/scripts/blob/master/README.md#auto-review---automatically-detect-known-issues-in-openqa-jobs-label-openqa-jobs-with-ticket-references-and-optionally-retrigger . Also if you like you can try to generate an image and use accordingly by triggering openQA jobs with WORKER_CLASS=openqaworker-arm-4
to force pinning to one of our newer ARM machines to see if the problem appears there as well.
Updated by rfan1 about 3 years ago
okurz wrote:
hm, I suspect that our workers openqaworker-arm-[123] can be even trusted less than we think.
note to team: I suggest to crosscheck the checksum of assets before and after to see if something goes wrong on generation, transfer or use.
@rfan I think you could help by updating the ticket with a regex matching the error condition to use https://github.com/os-autoinst/scripts/blob/master/README.md#auto-review---automatically-detect-known-issues-in-openqa-jobs-label-openqa-jobs-with-ticket-references-and-optionally-retrigger . Also if you like you can try to generate an image and use accordingly by triggering openQA jobs with
WORKER_CLASS=openqaworker-arm-4
to force pinning to one of our newer ARM machines to see if the problem appears there as well.
Thanks Oliver! will do!
https://openqa.suse.de/tests/7214160
qemu-img info sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64_sb.qcow2¶
image: sle-15-SP3-aarch64-187.1-textmode@aarch64_sb.qcow2
file format: qcow2
virtual size: 20 GiB (21474836480 bytes)
disk size: 3.17 GiB
cluster_size: 65536
Format specific information:
compat: 1.1
compression type: zlib
lazy refcounts: false
refcount bits: 16
corrupt: false
extended l2: false
Updated by okurz about 3 years ago
- Priority changed from Normal to Low
as so far no further impact was reported by others I regard this as low prio. @rfan1 any update from your side?
Updated by rfan1 about 3 years ago
Thanks Oliver!
Agree with you since the issue is not seen any more with higher performance worker.
Updated by rfan1 about 3 years ago
- Copied to action #101015: [tools][sle][x86_64][aarch64][QEMUTPM] can openqa create swtpm device automatically? size:M added
Updated by rfan1 about 3 years ago
- Copied to deleted (action #101015: [tools][sle][x86_64][aarch64][QEMUTPM] can openqa create swtpm device automatically? size:M)
Updated by okurz about 3 years ago
- Project changed from openQA Tests (public) to openQA Project (public)
- Category changed from Infrastructure to Support
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
Alright. I still consider it worthwhile to ensure that assets are correctly generated/uploaded/downloaded with checksums. So this can be a potential future improvement. Added in #65271