action #92851
closedcoordination #91646: [saga][epic] SUSE Maintenance QA workflows with fully automated testing, approval and release
openQA Project - coordination #89062: [epic] Simplify review for SUSE QAM
Workshop series proposal "How SUSE QE teams review openQA test results"
0%
Description
Motivation¶
Many people are busy every day with Changes to the review process are proposed https://confluence.suse.com/display/~vpelcak/Draft+-+Change+in+openQA+QE+Maintenance+Review
I created a proposal on https://progress.opensuse.org/projects/qa/wiki/Wiki#Workshop-Topics for "How we review openQA test results, by SUSE QE teams". I think it would be great if people from every QE team would present how they do the daily openQA test result review. We all could learn from each other this way to improve, find new ways, learn how certain features are used, which ones are unused or unknown, where to extend, etc.
Suggestions¶
Find person from each team, propose date and speaker for each team.
Updated by livdywan over 3 years ago
- Status changed from Workable to In Progress
- Assignee set to livdywan
I'm starting some conversations to see who might like to volunteer.
To be clear, the conversation referred to is not especially relevant here. No context required. This should be something like:
- This is what we do in the squad
- This is a typical task during the day
- Workflows and tools around openQA test review
The idea being that this can provide perspective to others who may have no or little knowledge of what people do. This could help put bug reports and feature requests into context.
Updated by okurz over 3 years ago
I haven't seen conversations by you for this topic although I am in quite some communication channels. If you do direct messaging, care to shift more to group chats?
Updated by livdywan over 3 years ago
okurz wrote:
I haven't seen conversations by you for this topic although I am in quite some communication channels. If you do direct messaging, care to shift more to group chats?
Correct. I was chatting to Orestis first to sanity-check the idea and phrasing. Next step inviting people in various channels.
Updated by livdywan over 3 years ago
Brief update. I got some feedback and questions after posting the invite on different squad channels. I had to clarify that any open slot is fine, and also there's no particular rush. Whenever people are available we'll make it work. It's a request, not a demand :-D
Updated by livdywan over 3 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
- Invited update validation squad (RC, some feedback)
- Invited yast squad (RC)
- Invited kernel squad (RC+email, some feedback)
- Invited the virt squad (RC)
- Invited the core squad (RC)
Got also migration, container, security on my list but not sure where to send invites
Updated by okurz over 3 years ago
cdywan wrote:
- Invited update validation squad (RC, some feedback)
- Invited yast squad (RC)
- Invited kernel squad (RC+email, some feedback)
- Invited the virt squad (RC)
- Invited the core squad (RC)
Got also migration, container, security on my list but not sure where to send invites
Send to qa-team@suse.de and invite a representative of every squad. If no one speaks up for a squad escalate to QE mgmt that a squad completely vanished ;)
It looks very unprofessional but I assume nowadays https://confluence.suse.com/display/qasle/QE+squads+-+new+structure is the best reference for you to see the current setup of squads. Why do I consider it unprofessional? Well, a page that says "new structure" sounds like someone only made a very short-term decision to draft up a page to describe a change in organisation while existing references like https://progress.opensuse.org/projects/suseqa/ and https://wiki.suse.net/index.php?title=SUSE-Quality_Assurance/SLE_Department are not updated. Then the "new structure" page is the current one until there will be a "new new structure" or "new structure - final v.2, for real!" ;)
Updated by maritawerner over 3 years ago
Oli, you are very right that the wiki page will not be updated anymore. The confluence area of QE LSG is the main source of information. And to make you happy, I have removed the "neW" in new structure.
Updated by livdywan over 3 years ago
- Due date set to 2021-07-09
- Private changed from No to Yes
Setting a due date for the end of the week, let's try and make those proposals firm
Updated by livdywan over 3 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
So we got another topic this morning, two more firm submissions and another couple promises. And there have been repeated invitations on different channels. Perhaps this can be considered resolved.